Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31064366›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

"Doing a good thing for myself": a qualitative study of young adults' strategies for reducing takeaway food consumption.

Anne C Grunseit, Amelia S Cook, Janet Conti, Melissa Gwizd, Margaret Allman-Farinelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Self-care research: Where are we now? Where are we going?International journal of nursing studies · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anne C GrunseitSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney Prevention Research Collaboration, Sydney, Australia.
Amelia S CookSchool of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia. amelia.cook@westernsydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9443-3821
Janet ContiSchool of Social Sciences and Psychology, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Melissa GwizdSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney Prevention Research Collaboration, Sydney, Australia.
Margaret Allman-FarinelliCharles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasingly the population is eating meals and snacks prepared outside the home, especially younger adults. Takeaway foods can be energy-dense, high in saturated fat and sodium, and deleterious to health. Extending studies examining the barriers to healthy eating, this paper explores strategies employed by young adults who report reducing consumption of unhealthy takeaway foods.

methodsYoung adults aged 18 to 35 years in paid employment were recruited to participate in eight semi-structured focus groups. In response to initial findings, recruitment for the final four groups refocused on participants who either wanted, were in the process of, or had changed their takeaway food habits. Focus group recordings were transcribed verbatim and coded by two researchers for recurrent themes using an inductive method.

resultsForty-eight participants with a mean BMI of 23.4 kg/m

conclusionsOur participants reported strategies they believed led to them successfully reduce their takeaway food consumption by matching the attractions (e.g., convenience) and countering apparent disincentives for reducing consumption (e.g., losing a reward) of takeaway food. They reported eschewing more short-term rewards and costs, to prioritise their health, believing that avoiding these foods would benefit them personally and financially. The identified strategies are consistent with documented techniques for successful behaviour change and corresponded to all levels in the social-ecological model from intrapersonal factors to public policy. The findings could underpin health promotion strategies to support this at-risk group.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyFast FoodsAdolescentAdultAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesDietFeeding BehaviorFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleQualitative ResearchSocial EnvironmentYoung AdultBehaviour changeFast foodsQualitativeReady-to-eat mealsTake-away foodsYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID31064366
PMCPMC6505251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.