Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31064348›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

The SYNBREED chicken diversity panel: a global resource to assess chicken diversity at high genomic resolution.

Dorcus Kholofelo Malomane, Henner Simianer, Annett Weigend, Christian Reimer, Armin Otto Schmitt, Steffen Weigend

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dorcus Kholofelo MalomaneAnimal Breeding and Genetics Group, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Goettingen, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4577-0781
Henner SimianerAnimal Breeding and Genetics Group, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Goettingen, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
Annett WeigendInstitute of Farm Animal Genetics, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, 31535, Neustadt, Germany.
Christian ReimerAnimal Breeding and Genetics Group, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Goettingen, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
Armin Otto SchmittCenter for Integrated Breeding Research, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Goettingen, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
Steffen WeigendCenter for Integrated Breeding Research, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Goettingen, 37075, Goettingen, Germany. Steffen.Weigend@fli.de.

Funding

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research FKZ 0315528E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince domestication, chickens did not only disperse into the different parts of the world but they have also undergone significant genomic changes in this process. Many breeds, strains or lines have been formed and those represent the diversity of the species. However, other than the natural evolutionary forces, management practices (including those that threaten the persistence of genetic diversity) following domestication have shaped the genetic make-up of and diversity between today's chicken breeds. As part of the SYNBREED project, samples from a wide variety of chicken populations have been collected across the globe and were genotyped with a high density SNP array. The panel consists of the wild type, commercial layers and broilers, indigenous village/local type and fancy chicken breeds. The SYNBREED chicken diversity panel (SCDP) is made available to serve as a public basis to study the genetic structure of chicken diversity. In the current study we analyzed the genetic diversity between and within the populations in the SCDP, which is important for making informed decisions for effective management of farm animal genetic resources.

resultsMany of the fancy breeds cover a wide spectrum and clustered with other breeds of similar supposed origin as shown by the phylogenetic tree and principal component analysis. However, the fancy breeds as well as the highly selected commercial layer lines have reduced genetic diversity within the population, with the average observed heterozygosity estimates lower than 0.205 across their breeds' categories and the average proportion of polymorphic loci lower than 0.680. We show that there is still a lot of genetic diversity preserved within the wild and less selected African, South American and some local Asian and European breeds with the average observed heterozygosity greater than 0.225 and the average proportion of polymorphic loci larger than 0.720 within their breeds' categories.

conclusionsIt is important that such highly diverse breeds are maintained for the sustainability and flexibility of future chicken breeding. This diversity panel provides opportunities for exploitation for further chicken molecular genetic studies. With the possibility to further expand, it constitutes a very useful community resource for chicken genetic diversity research.

Indexed as

BreedingGenetic MarkersGenetics, PopulationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsChickensComputational BiologyFemaleGenotypeMalePhylogenyGenetic MarkersFancy breedsGenetic diversityGlobal chickensSNPsSYNBREED panel

Identifiers

PMID31064348
PMCPMC6505202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.