Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31064258›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2019

Increasing sulfate levels show a differential impact on synthetic communities comprising different methanogens and a sulfate reducer.

Jing Chen, Matthew J Wade, Jan Dolfing, Orkun S Soyer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jing Chen1 School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick , Coventry CV4 7AL , UK.
Matthew J Wade3 School of Engineering, Newcastle University , Newcastle NE1 7RU , UK.
Jan Dolfing3 School of Engineering, Newcastle University , Newcastle NE1 7RU , UK.
Orkun S Soyer1 School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick , Coventry CV4 7AL , UK.
Newcastle University · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K003240/2Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M017982/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methane-producing microbial communities are of ecological and biotechnological interest. Syntrophic interactions among sulfate reducers and aceto/hydrogenotrophic and obligate hydrogenotrophic methanogens form a key component of these communities, yet, the impact of these different syntrophic routes on methane production and their stability against sulfate availability are not well understood. Here, we construct model synthetic communities using a sulfate reducer and two types of methanogens representing different methanogenesis routes. We find that tri-cultures with both routes increase methane production by almost twofold compared to co-cultures and are stable in the absence of sulfate. With increasing sulfate, system stability and productivity decreases and does so faster in communities with aceto/hydrogenotrophic methanogens despite the continued presence of acetate. We show that this is due to a shift in the metabolism of these methanogens towards co-utilization of hydrogen with acetate. These findings indicate the important role of hydrogen dynamics in the stability and productivity of syntrophic communities.

Indexed as

Desulfovibrio vulgarisMethaneMethanococcusMethanosarcina barkeriOxidation-ReductionSulfatesMethaneSulfatesacetotrophic methanogensanaerobic digestioncommunity stabilityhydrogenotrophic methanogensmicrobial interactionsulfate-reducing bacteria

Identifiers

PMID31064258
PMCPMC6544901
OpenAlexW2940246800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.