Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31064154›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2019

Modifications in Vaginal Microbiota and Their Influence on Drug Release: Challenges and Opportunities.

Gerardo Leyva-Gómez, María L Del Prado-Audelo, Silvestre Ortega-Peña, Néstor Mendoza-Muñoz, Zaida Urbán-Morlán, Maykel González-Torres, Manuel González-Del Carmen, Gabriela Figueroa-González, Octavio D Reyes-Hernández, Hernán Cortés

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Recovery ofNutrients · 2020
    Trial
  4. Obstetric Pharmacomicrobiomics.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Prevalence ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Vaginal Sheets withGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gerardo Leyva-GómezDepartamento de Farmacia, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico. gerardoleyva@hotmail.com.
María L Del Prado-AudeloDepartamento de Farmacia, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico. ml.delprado@iim.unam.mx.
Silvestre Ortega-PeñaLaboratorio de Infectología, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico. silvestreortega@yahoo.com.mx.
Néstor Mendoza-MuñozFacultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad de Colima, Colima 28400, Mexico. nmendoza0@ucol.mx.
Zaida Urbán-MorlánDepartamento de Farmacia, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico. mzum_1212@hotmail.com.
Maykel González-TorresCONACyT-Laboratorio de Biotecnología, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Ciudad de México 14389, Mexico. mikegcu@gmail.com.
Manuel González-Del CarmenFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Veracruzana, Ciudad Mendoza, Veracruz 94740, Mexico. manueldelcarmen@hotmail.com.
Gabriela Figueroa-GonzálezCONACyT-Laboratorio de Genómica, Dirección de Investigación, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Av. San Fernando 22, Tlalpan, Sección XVI, 14080 Ciudad de México, Mexico. gabufg@gmail.com.
Octavio D Reyes-HernándezLaboratorio de Biología Molecular del Cáncer, UMIEZ, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Zaragoza, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 09230, Mexico. maiden_sp@yahoo.com.mx.
Hernán CortésLaboratorio de Medicina Genómica, Departamento de Genética, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Ciudad de México 14389, Mexico. hcortes@inr.gob.mx.

Funding

Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México PAPIIT TA 200318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaginal drug delivery represents an attractive alternative to achieve local and systemic effects due to the high contact surface exposed, the mucoadhesion of the epithelium, and the high innervation that facilitates the absorption of drugs into the bloodstream. However, despite the confinement of the vaginal cavity, it is an organ with a highly variable microenvironment. Mechanical alterations such as coitus, or chemical changes such as pH and viscosity, modify the release of drugs. In addition, changes in vaginal microbiota can influence the entire vaginal microenvironment, thus determining the disposition of drugs in the vaginal cavity and decreasing their therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, the influence of microorganisms on vaginal homeostasis can change the pre-established scenario for the application of drugs. This review aims to provide an explanation of normal vaginal microbiota, the factors that modify it, its involvement in the administration of drugs, and new proposals for the design of novel pharmaceutical dosage forms. Finally, challenges and opportunities directed toward the conception of new effective formulations are discussed.

Indexed as

biofilmdrug releasehydrogelspH sensitive hydrogelsvaginal drug deliveryvaginal microbiota

Identifiers

PMID31064154
PMCPMC6571606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.