Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31063870›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials2019

Rationale and design for a pragmatic effectiveness-implementation trial of online behavioral obesity treatment in primary care.

Hallie M Espel-Huynh, Rena R Wing, Carly M Goldstein, J Graham Thomas

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hallie M Espel-HuynhWeight Control and Diabetes Research Center, The Miriam Hospital, 196 Richmond St., Providence, RI 02903, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 222 Richmond St., Providence, RI 02903, USA. Electronic address: hallie_espel-huynh@brown.edu.
Rena R WingWeight Control and Diabetes Research Center, The Miriam Hospital, 196 Richmond St., Providence, RI 02903, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 222 Richmond St., Providence, RI 02903, USA.
Carly M GoldsteinWeight Control and Diabetes Research Center, The Miriam Hospital, 196 Richmond St., Providence, RI 02903, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 222 Richmond St., Providence, RI 02903, USA.
J Graham ThomasWeight Control and Diabetes Research Center, The Miriam Hospital, 196 Richmond St., Providence, RI 02903, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 222 Richmond St., Providence, RI 02903, USA.
Miriam Hospital · USBrown University · US

Funding

Pragmatic Trial of Technology-Supported Behavioral Obesity Treatment in the Primary Care Setting: A Multiphase Effectiveness and Implementation Hybrid DesignR18DK114715 · NIDDK · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI THOMAS, JOHN GRAHAM, WING, RENA R · 2017 to 2020
$2.6M
Optimization and Evaluation of a Tailored Behavioral eHealth/mHealth Weight Loss Intervention for Cardiac Rehabilitation Patients Using the Multiphase Optimization StrategyK23HL136845 · NHLBI · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI GOLDSTEIN, CARLY MICHELLE · 2018 to 2022
$930k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL136845NIDDK NIH HHS R18 DK114715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent guidelines recommend behavioral intervention to achieve a modest weight loss (e.g., 3-5%) as a first-line obesity treatment. Online behavioral obesity treatment, delivered via the Rx Weight Loss (RxWL) program, produces clinically significant initial weight losses. However, the program's pragmatic utility in routine medical care has yet to be tested. Further, additional research is needed to determine how best to extend the RxWL program to facilitate weight loss maintenance. This paper summarizes methods for a pragmatic trial aimed at identifying optimal methods for implementation of RxWL in primary care and evaluating relative effectiveness of two approaches to weight loss maintenance. STUDY

designRxWL will be implemented in a network of approximately 60 primary care clinics. Implementation outcomes (program uptake and completion metrics) will be compared between a Basic Implementation Intervention consisting primarily of access to RxWL, and an Enhanced Implementation Intervention with additional training in strategies for motivating and supporting patients in their use of RxWL and online clinician support tools for tracking patient progress. Second, two intervention approaches (Monthly Lessons versus Refresher Courses) within the RxWL patient platform will be tested against an educational control condition, and effects on 1-year weight loss maintenance will be compared.

conclusionThis study will provide essential information about the feasibility and utility of online obesity treatment in primary care. It will provide novel information on two approaches to weight loss maintenance for patients in this setting. This project fills key gaps in evidence regarding best practices for obesity treatment in primary care.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBehavior TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicPrimary Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTherapy, Computer-AssistedTreatment OutcomeWeight Reduction ProgramsYoung AdultHybrid implementation-effectiveness trialObesityPrimary careWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID31063870
PMCPMC6606329
OpenAlexW2944583710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.