Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31063678›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroendocrinology2020

Achieving CLARITY on bisphenol A, brain and behaviour.

Heather B Patisaul

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroendocrinology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Microplastics: A Threat for Male Fertility.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  16. The Impact of Environmental Chemicals on the Gut Microbiome.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heather B PatisaulDepartment of Biological Sciences, Center for Human Health and the Environment, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-1278-2890
North Carolina State University · US

Funding

Neurobehavioral effects of Bisphenol A Across age and sexU01ES020929 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI PATISAUL, HEATHER B, ROSENFELD, CHERYL SUSAN · 2011 to 2014
$775k
NIEHS NIH HHS U011ES020929NIEHS NIH HHS U01 ES020929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is perhaps no endocrine disrupting chemical more controversial than bisphenol A (BPA). Comprising a high-volume production chemical used in a variety of applications, BPA has been linked to a litany of adverse health-related outcomes, including effects on brain sexual differentiation and behaviour. Risk assessors preferentially rely on classical guideline-compliant toxicity studies over studies published by academic scientists, and have generally downplayed concerns about the potential risks that BPA poses to human health. It has been argued, however, that, because traditional toxicity studies rarely contain neural endpoints, and only a paucity of endocrine-sensitive endpoints, they are incapable of fully evaluating harm. To address current controversies on the safety of BPA, the United States National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, the National Toxicology Program (NTP), and the US Food and Drug Administration established the Consortium Linking Academic and Regulatory Insights on BPA Toxicity (CLARITY-BPA). CLARITY-BPA performed a classical regulatory-style toxicology study (Core study) in conjunction with multiple behavioural, molecular and cellular studies conducted by academic laboratories (grantee studies) using a collaboratively devised experimental framework and the same animals and tissues. This review summarises the results from the grantee studies that focused on brain and behaviour. Evidence of altered neuroendocrine development, including age- and sex-specific expression of oestrogen receptor (ER)α and ERβ, and the abrogation of brain and behavioural sexual dimorphisms, supports the conclusion that developmental BPA exposure, even at doses below what regulatory agencies regard as "safe" for humans, contribute to brain and behavioural change. The consistency and the reproducibility of the effects across CLARITY-BPA and prior studies using the same animal strain and almost identical experimental conditions are compelling. Combined analysis of all of the data from the CLARITY-BPA project is underway at the NTP and a final report expected in late 2019.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalBenzhydryl CompoundsBisphenol A CompoundsBrainEndocrine DisruptorsFemaleHumansMaleNeuronsPhenolsPregnancySex DifferentiationUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationBenzhydryl Compoundsbisphenol ABisphenol A CompoundsEndocrine DisruptorsPhenolsamygdalaanxietyEDCendocrine disrupting chemicalhypothalamusoxytocin

Identifiers

PMID31063678
PMCPMC10947534
OpenAlexW2944032608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.