Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31063621›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2019

Measuring Quality in Home Healthcare.

Andrew W Dick, Meghan T Murray, Ashley M Chastain, Elizabeth A Madigan, Mark Sorbero, Patricia W Stone, Jingjing Shang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Home Care for the Elderly: An Integrated Approach to Perception, Quality of Life, and Cognition.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrew W DickRAND Health, The RAND Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts.
Meghan T MurrayCenter for Health Policy, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York.
Ashley M ChastainCenter for Health Policy, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-9642-9749
Elizabeth A MadiganIndependent Researcher, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Mark SorberoRAND Health, The RAND Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts.
Patricia W StoneCenter for Health Policy, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York.
Jingjing ShangCenter for Health Policy, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York.

Funding

Infection Prevention in Home Health Care (InHOME)R01NR016865 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SHANG, JINGJING, STONE, PATRICIA W. · 2017 to 2025
$6.4M
Alliance for Home Health Quality and InnovationNINR NIH HHS R01 NR016865the Office of the Director of the National Institutes of Health R01NR016865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesImproving quality performance in home health is an increasingly high priority. The objective of this study was to examine trends in industry performance over time using three quality measures: a composite quality metric (Q index), an infection prevention measure (vaccination verification), and an outcome measure (hospital avoidance). DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS/MEASURES: We linked Home Health Compare and Provider of Services data from 2012 to 2016, which included 39 211 observations during the 5-year study period and 7670 agencies in 2016. The Q index was developed to allow comparability over time, equally weighting the contributions of each element. After examining summary statistics, we developed three regression models stratified by ownership (for-profit/nonprofit agency) and included two constructs of nurse staffing, in addition to controlling for known confounders.

resultsMost agencies (80.4%) were for-profit agencies. The Q index and vaccination verification improved substantially over time, but there was no change in hospital avoidance. Ownership status was associated with all three measures (P < .001). Registered nurse staffing (relative to licensed practical nurses and home health aides) was associated with higher Q index and vaccination verification (P < .001).

conclusionThe Q index allows for assessment of trends over time in home healthcare. Ownership and nurse staffing are important factors in the quality of care. The overall home care market is driven by for-profit agencies, but their characteristics and outcomes differ from nonprofit agencies. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1859-1865, 2019.

Indexed as

Quality Indicators, Health CareHome Care ServicesHumansOwnershipPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingReference StandardsRegression AnalysisUnited Stateshome healthcareownershipquality measurementstaffing

Identifiers

PMID31063621
PMCPMC6732006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.