Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31063575›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2019

Effect of Aclidinium Bromide on Major Cardiovascular Events and Exacerbations in High-Risk Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: The ASCENT-COPD Randomized Clinical Trial.

Robert A Wise, Kenneth R Chapman, Benjamin M Scirica, Deepak L Bhatt, Sami Z Daoud, Sofia Zetterstrand, Colin Reisner, Esther Garcia Gil

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEquivalence TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01966107 (Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Phase IV Study to Evaluate the Effect of Aclidinium Bromide on Long-term Cardiovascular Safety and COPD Exacerbations in Patients With Moderate to Very Severe COPD), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01966107 phase4completednot on this map

Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Phase IV Study to Evaluate the Effect of Aclidinium Bromide on Long-term Cardiovascular Safety and COPD Exacerbations in Patients With Moderate to Very Severe COPD (ASCENT COPD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAstraZenecaRan2013 to 2017Enrolled3,635ConditionsCOPD, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Moderate to Very Severe COPDArmsAclidinium Bromide, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy and cardiovascular safety of LAMA in patients with COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. New Perspectives on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Robert A WiseJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kenneth R ChapmanUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Benjamin M SciricaBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Deepak L BhattBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sami Z DaoudAstraZeneca Research and Development Centre, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Sofia ZetterstrandAstraZeneca Research and Development, Bioinformatics and Information Sciences, Mölndal, Sweden.
Colin ReisnerAstraZeneca Research and Development Centre, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Esther Garcia GilAstraZeneca Research and Development Centre, Barcelona, Spain.
AstraZeneca (United States) · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USAstraZeneca (Spain) · ESAstraZeneca (Sweden) · SEJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: There is concern that long-acting muscarinic antagonists increase cardiovascular morbidity or mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Objective: To determine the cardiovascular safety (noninferiority) and efficacy (superiority) of aclidinium bromide, 400 μg twice daily, in patients with COPD and cardiovascular disease or risk factors. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-design study conducted at 522 sites in North America. A total of 3630 patients with moderate to very severe COPD and either a history of cardiovascular disease or at least 2 atherothrombotic risk factors were randomized; follow-up occurred for up to 3 years until at least 122 major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occurred. The first patient was enrolled on October 16, 2013 and the last on August 22, 2016. The final patient completed follow-up on September 21, 2017. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive aclidinium (n = 1812) or placebo (n = 1818) by dry-powder inhaler, twice daily for up to 3 years. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary safety end point was time to first MACE over up to 3 years (hazard ratio [HR] 1-sided 97.5% CI noninferiority margin = 1.8). The primary efficacy end point was the annual COPD exacerbation rate during the first year of treatment. Secondary outcomes included an expanded MACE definition (time to first MACE or serious cardiovascular event of interest) and annual rate of exacerbations requiring hospitalization. Results: Among 3589 patients analyzed (mean age, 67.2 years; 58.7% male), 2537 (70.7%) completed the study. Of these, 69 (3.9%) aclidinium and 76 (4.2%) placebo patients had a MACE (HR, 0.89; 1-sided 97.5% CI, 0-1.23); the expanded MACE definition included 168 (9.4%) aclidinium vs 160 (8.9%) placebo patients with events (HR, 1.03; 1-sided 97.5% CI, 0-1.28). Annual moderate to severe exacerbation rates (aclidinium, 0.44; placebo, 0.57; rate ratio, 0.78; 2-sided 95% CI, 0.68-0.89; P < .001) and rate of exacerbations requiring hospitalization (aclidinium, 0.07; placebo, 0.10; rate ratio, 0.65; 2-sided 95% CI, 0.48-0.89; P = .006) decreased significantly with aclidinium vs placebo. The most common adverse events were pneumonia (aclidinium, 109 events [6.1%]; placebo, 105 events [5.8%]), urinary tract infection (aclidinium, 93 events [5.2%]; placebo, 89 events [5.0%]), and upper respiratory tract infection (aclidinium, 86 events [4.8%]; placebo, 101 events [5.6%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with COPD and increased cardiovascular risk, aclidinium was noninferior to placebo for risk of MACE over 3 years. The rate of moderate to severe COPD exacerbations was reduced over the first year. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01966107.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAgedCardiovascular DiseasesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscarinic AntagonistsPatient AcuityPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRisk FactorsTropanesaclidinium bromideMuscarinic AntagonistsTropanes

Identifiers

PMID31063575
PMCPMC6506885
OpenAlexW2944206817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.