Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31063463›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Exploring the links between dispositions, romantic relationships, support networks and community inclusion in men and women.

Eiluned Pearce, Rafael Wlodarski, Anna Machin, Robin I M Dunbar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Why friendship and loneliness affect our health.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eiluned PearceSocial & Evolutionary Neuroscience Research Group, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4347-317X
Rafael WlodarskiSocial & Evolutionary Neuroscience Research Group, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Anna MachinSocial & Evolutionary Neuroscience Research Group, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Robin I M DunbarSocial & Evolutionary Neuroscience Research Group, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most studies of social cognition have focused on dyadic relationships, and rather few have looked at how we engage with individuals in the wider social world into which we are embedded. Here we use principle component analysis (PCA) and path analysis to explore how different aspects of human sociality interact. We demonstrate two distinct clusters in both sexes relating to (i) romantic relationships and (ii) wider social engagement, such as that with the local community. These two domains of relationship were associated with different dispositional traits: individual variation in impulsivity in the former, and in empathy and avoidant attachment in the latter. Although these clusters were broadly similar across both sexes, clearer differentiation is evident in males. In females only, support network size was positively related to the anxious dimension of attachment and, unlike in males, was not related to feelings of inclusion in the local community. This suggests that support networks may play different roles in the two sexes, indicating a productive line of future research. These findings have important practical applications: loneliness interventions that target the specific type of relationship that is felt to be lacking and the associated dispositional traits are likely to be more effective than more generic approaches.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorSocial NetworkingAdolescentAdultAgedAnxietyCognitionEmotionsEmpathyFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsLonelinessMaleMiddle AgedObject Attachment

Identifiers

PMID31063463
PMCPMC6504087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.