ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2019
Localizing Frustration in Proteins Using All-Atom Energy Functions.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Aggregation-Prone Pathogenic SOD1 Variants in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Insights from Computational Genomics and Evolutionary Conservation.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2025Article
- Pathogenic mutation impairs functional dynamics of Hsp60 in mono- and oligomeric states.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Frustration Dynamics and Electron-Transfer Reorganization Energies in Wild-Type and Mutant Azurins.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2022Article
- Mechanism of activation and the rewired network: New drug design concepts.Medicinal research reviews · 2022Review
- Surveying biomolecular frustration at atomic resolution.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Article
- Simple Model of Protein Energetics To Identify Ab Initio Folding Transitions from All-Atom MD Simulations of Proteins.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The problems of protein folding and protein design are two sides of the same coin. Protein folding involves exploring a protein's configuration space given a fixed sequence, whereas protein design involves searching in sequence space given a particular target structure. For a protein to fold quickly and reliably, its energy landscape must be biased toward the folded ensemble throughout its configuration space and must lack deep kinetic traps that would otherwise frustrate folding. Evolution has "designed" the sequences of many naturally occurring proteins, through an eons-long process of random mutation and selection, to yield landscapes with a minimal degree of frustration. The task facing humans hoping to design protein sequences that fold into particular structures is to use the available approximate energy functions to sculpt funneled landscapes that work in the laboratory. In this work, we demonstrate how to calculate several localized frustration measures using an all-atom energy function. Specifically, we employ the Rosetta energy function, which has been used successfully to design proteins and which has a natural pairwise decomposition that is suitably solvent-averaged. We calculate these newly developed frustration measures for both a mutated WW domain, FiP35, and a three-helix bundle that was designed completely by humans, Alpha3D. The structure of FiP35 exhibits less localized frustration than that of Alpha3D. A mutation toward the consensus sequence for WW domains in FiP35, which has been shown unexpectedly in experiment to disrupt folding, induces localized frustration by disrupting the hydrophobic core. By performing a limited redesign on the sequence of Alpha3D, we show that some, but not all, mutations that lower the energy also result in decreased frustration. The results suggest that, in addition to being useful for detecting residual frustration in protein structures, optimizing the localized frustration measures presented here may be a useful and automatic means of balancing positive and negative design in protein design tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.