Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31063195›Full record

ArticleJournal of deaf studies and deaf education2019

Morphological Accuracy in the Speech of Bimodal Bilingual Children with CIs.

Corina Goodwin, Diane Lillo-Martin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of deaf studies and deaf education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Family ASL: An Early Start to Equitable Education for Deaf Children.Topics in early childhood special education · 2023
    Article
  6. Learning a Sign Language Does Not Hinder Acquisition of a Spoken Language.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023
    Article
  7. Writing Development in DHH Students: A Bimodal Bilingual Approach.Journal of deaf studies and deaf education · 2023
    Article
  8. Lessons to be Learned from Bimodal Bilingualism.Hrvatska revija za rehabilitacijska istrazivanja · 2022
    Article
  9. Acquisition of Sign Languages.Annual review of linguistics · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Corina GoodwinUniversity of Connecticut.
Diane Lillo-MartinUniversity of Connecticut & Haskins Laboratories.
Haskins Laboratories · US

Funding

Development of Bimodal BilingualismR01DC009263 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI LILLO-MARTIN, DIANE CAROLYN · 2009 to 2013
$3.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sign language use in the (re)habilitation of children with cochlear implants (CIs) remains a controversial issue. Concerns that signing impedes spoken language development are based on research comparing children exposed to spoken and signed language (bilinguals) to children exposed only to speech (monolinguals), although abundant research demonstrates that bilinguals and monolinguals differ in language development. We control for bilingualism effects by comparing bimodal bilingual (signing-speaking) children with CIs (BB-CI) to those with typical hearing (BB-TH). Each child had at least one Deaf parent and was exposed to ASL from birth. The BB-THs were exposed to English from birth by hearing family members, while the BB-CIs began English exposure after cochlear implantation around 22-months-of-age. Elicited speech samples were analyzed for accuracy of English grammatical morpheme production. Although there was a trend toward lower overall accuracy in the BB-CIs, this seemed driven by increased omission of the plural -s, suggesting an exaggerated role of perceptual salience in this group. Errors of commission were rare in both groups. Because both groups were bimodal bilinguals, trends toward group differences were likely caused by delayed exposure to spoken language or hearing through a CI, rather than sign language exposure.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsMultilingualismSign LanguageSpeechChildChild LanguageChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID31063195
PMCPMC6786513
OpenAlexW2944065637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.