Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31063176›Full record

SynthesisJornal brasileiro de nefrologia

Montreal Cognitive Assessment for cognitive assessment in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review.

Thaís Malucelli Amatneeks, Amer Cavalheiro Hamdan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07630688 (Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of the MoCA-B Test), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07630688 completednot on this map

Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of the MoCA-B Test

TypeobservationalSponsorAntalya Training and Research HospitalRan2024 to 2026Enrolled166ConditionsBehavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia, Dementia, Dementia (Diagnosis), Dementia Alzheimer Type
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thaís Malucelli AmatneeksFundação Pró-Renal, Setor de Psicologia, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1270-6900
Amer Cavalheiro HamdanUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Departamento de Psicologia, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
Fundo Brasil · BRUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is evidence in the literature that cognitive impairment is more prevalent in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) than in the general population. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is an instrument with a good application profile for cognitive evaluation of patients with CKD-like impairments. The objective of this study is to perform a systematic review of MoCA use in the context of CKD.

methodThe keywords "Montreal Cognitive Assessment", "Kidney Disease" and "Chronic Kidney Disease" were used to search the databases. The inclusion criteria were: a) empirical articles; b) approach to cognitive impairment in CKD; c) papers in Portuguese and English.

resultsThe studies were mostly cross-sectional, published in medical journals, with research carried out mostly in Europe. About 45% of the studies had samples of less than 150 participants and variations in the prevalence of cognitive impairment were found ranging from 28.9% to 74.6%. The cutoff point for the identification of the impairment presented variation between the studies. DISCUSSION: The results' analysis demonstrates the need for more complete studies on MoCA scoring and adaptation in its different versions. We recommend to the health professionals who will use the results in the clinical setting that the interpretation of the results be made in the light of studies more related to the context lived by the patients.

conclusionsThe instrument is efficient to be used in several stages and treatment modalities of the disease. We point to the need to adapt a cut-off point for the instrument in the different translations of the instrument.

Indexed as

Mental Status and Dementia TestsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCognitive DysfunctionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRenal Insufficiency, Chronic

Identifiers

PMID31063176
PMCPMC6534019
OpenAlexW2914577353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.