Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31063100›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2019

Risk factor analysis, antimicrobial resistance and pathotyping of Escherichia coli associated with pre- and post-weaning piglet diarrhoea in organised farms, India.

O R VinodhKumar, B R Singh, D K Sinha, B S Pruthvishree, Shika Tamta, Z B Dubal, R Karthikeyan, Ramkumar N Rupner, Y S Malik

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

O R VinodhKumarDivision of Epidemiology,ICAR - Indian Veterinary Research Institute,Bareilly,India.ORCID 0000-0002-7232-4122
B R SinghDivision of Epidemiology,ICAR - Indian Veterinary Research Institute,Bareilly,India.
D K SinhaDivision of Epidemiology,ICAR - Indian Veterinary Research Institute,Bareilly,India.
B S PruthvishreeDivision of Epidemiology,ICAR - Indian Veterinary Research Institute,Bareilly,India.
Shika TamtaDivision of Epidemiology,ICAR - Indian Veterinary Research Institute,Bareilly,India.
Z B DubalDivision of Veterinary Public Health,ICAR - Indian Veterinary Research Institute,Bareilly,India.
R KarthikeyanDivision of Epidemiology,ICAR - Indian Veterinary Research Institute,Bareilly,India.
Ramkumar N RupnerDivision of Epidemiology,ICAR - Indian Veterinary Research Institute,Bareilly,India.
Y S MalikDivision of Biological Standardization,ICAR - Indian Veterinary Research Institute,Bareilly,India.
Indian Veterinary Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A cross-sectional study was conducted from 2014 to 2017 in 13 organised pig farms located in eight states of India (Northern, North-Eastern and Southern regions) to identify the risk factors, pathotype and antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli associated with pre- and post-weaning piglet diarrhoea. The data collected through questionnaire survey were used to identify the risk factors by univariable analysis, in which weaning status, season, altitude, ventilation in the shed, use of heater/cooler for temperature control in the sheds, feed type, water source, and use of disinfectant, were the potential risk factors. In logistic regression model, weaning and source of water were the significant risk factors. The piglet diarrhoea prevalence was almost similar across the regions. Of the 909 faecal samples collected (North - 310, North-East - 194 and South - 405) for isolation of E. coli, pathotyping and antibiotic screening, 531 E. coli were isolated in MacConkey agar added with cefotaxime, where 345 isolates were extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers and were positive for blaCTX-M-1 (n = 147), bla TEM (n = 151), qnrA (n = 98), qnrB (n = 116), qnrS (n = 53), tetA (n = 46), tetB (n = 48) and sul1 (n = 54) genes. Multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) index revealed that 14 (2.64%) isolates had MAR index of 1. On the virulence screening of E. coli, 174 isolates harboured alone or combination of Stx1, Stx2, eaeA, hlyA genes. The isolates from diarrhoeic and post-weaning samples harboured higher number of virulence genes than non-diarrhoeic and pre-weaning. Alleviating the risk factors might reduce the piglet diarrhoea cases. The presence of multidrug-resistant and ESBL-producing pathogenic E. coli in piglets appears a public health concern.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesDiarrheaEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsIndiaRisk FactorsSwineSwine DiseasesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic resistanceE. colipathotypepiglet diarrhoearisk factors

Identifiers

PMID31063100
PMCPMC6518820
OpenAlexW2940180307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.