Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31062858›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019

Identification of differentially expressed gene sets using the Generalized Berk-Jones statistic.

Sheila M Gaynor, Ryan Sun, Xihong Lin, John Quackenbush

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sheila M GaynorDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Ryan SunDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Xihong LinDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
John QuackenbushDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Training Grant in Quantitative Sciences for Cancer ResearchT32CA009337 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI QUACKENBUSH, JOHN, TRIPPA, LORENZO · 1986 to 2025
$12.3M
Statistical Methods for Analysis of Massive Genetic and Genomic Data in Cancer ResearchR35CA197449 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI XIHONG LIN · 2015 to 2026
$10.9M
Statistical Methods for the Spatio-Temporal Assessment of Social Disparities in CancerP01CA134294 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI HANEUSE, SEBASTIEN, HERNAN, MIGUEL · 2008 to 2017
$6.8M
Unraveling the Complexities of Risk and Mechanism in CancerR35CA220523 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI QUACKENBUSH, JOHN · 2018 to 2024
$6.0M
Leveraging Family Data to Identify Genetic Variants for Sleep ApneaR01HL113338 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LIN, XIHONG, REDLINE, SUSAN S. · 2012 to 2016
$4.4M
WebMeV: A Robust Platform for Intuitive Genomic Data AnalysisU24CA231846 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI QUACKENBUSH, JOHN · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA134294NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197449NCI NIH HHS R35 CA220523NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009337NCI NIH HHS U24 CA231846NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL113338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationCancer genomics studies frequently aim to identify genes that are differentially expressed between clinically distinct patient subgroups, generally by testing single genes one at a time. However, the results of any individual transcriptomic study are often not fully reproducible. A particular challenge impeding statistical analysis is the difficulty of distinguishing between differential expression comprising part of the genomic disease etiology and that induced by downstream effects. More robust analytical approaches that are well-powered to detect potentially causative genes, are less prone to discovering spurious associations, and can deliver reproducible findings across different studies are needed.

resultsWe propose a set-based procedure for testing of differential expression and show that this set-based approach can produce more robust results by aggregating information across multiple, correlated genomic markers. Specifically, we adapt the Generalized Berk-Jones statistic to test for the transcription factors that may contribute to the progression of estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. We demonstrate the ability of our method to produce reproducible findings by applying the same analysis to 21 publicly available datasets, producing a similar list of significant transcription factors across most studies. Our Generalized Berk-Jones approach produces results that show improved consistency over three set-based testing algorithms: Generalized Higher Criticism, Gene Set Analysis and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Data are in the MetaGxBreast R package. Code is available at github.com/ryanrsun/gaynor_sun_GBJ_breast_cancer. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAlgorithmsBreast NeoplasmsGenomeHumansTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID31062858
PMCPMC6853697
OpenAlexW2944521374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.