Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31062837›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2019

Force of Infection and True Infection Rate of Dengue in Singapore: Implications for Dengue Control and Management.

Li Kiang Tan, Swee Ling Low, Haoyang Sun, Yuan Shi, Lilac Liu, Sally Lam, Hwee Huang Tan, Li Wei Ang, Wing Yan Wong, Rachel Chua and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Dengue and COVID-19: two sides of the same coin.Journal of biomedical science · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Li Kiang TanEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore.
Swee Ling LowEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore.
Haoyang SunSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Yuan ShiEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore.
Lilac LiuEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore.
Sally LamBlood Services Group, Health Sciences Authority, Singapore.
Hwee Huang TanBlood Services Group, Health Sciences Authority, Singapore.
Li Wei AngEpidemiology and Disease Control Division, Ministry of Health, Singapore.
Wing Yan WongEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore.
Rachel ChuaEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore.
Diana TeoBlood Services Group, Health Sciences Authority, Singapore.
Lee Ching NgEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore.
Alex R CookSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

National data on dengue notifications do not capture all dengue infections and do not reflect the true intensity of disease transmission. To assess the true dengue infection rate and disease control efforts in Singapore, we conducted age-stratified serosurveys among residents after a 2013 outbreak that was the largest dengue outbreak on record. The age-weighted prevalence of dengue immunoglobulin G among residents was 49.8% (95% confidence interval: 48.4, 51.1) in 2013 and 48.6% (95% confidence interval: 47.0, 50.0) in 2017; prevalence increased with age. Combining these data with those from previous serosurveys, the year-on-year estimates of the dengue force of infection from 1930 to 2017 revealed a significant decrease from the late 1960s to the mid-1990s, after which the force of infection remained stable at approximately 10 per 1,000 persons per year. The reproduction number (R0) had also declined since the 1960s. The reduction in dengue transmission may be attributed to the sustained national vector program and partly to a change in the age structure of the population. The improved estimated ratio of notified cases to true infections, from 1:14 in 2005-2009 to 1:6 in 2014-2017, signifies that the national notification system, which relies on diagnosed cases, has improved over time. The data also suggest that the magnitudes of dengue epidemics cannot be fairly compared across calendar years and that the current disease control program remains applicable.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBayes TheoremCommunicable Disease ControlDengueFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GMaleMiddle AgedSeroepidemiologic StudiesSingaporeImmunoglobulin Gbasic reproduction numberBayesian modeldengueforce of infectioninfectious diseaseseroprevalencevector control

Identifiers

PMID31062837
PMCPMC6670050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.