ArticleJournal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine2019
Evaluation of two distinct placental-derived membranes and their effect on tenocyte responses in vitro.
Article in Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of placental membrane in ACL graft healing - A series of 18 patients.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2024Article
- Varying Properties of Extracellular Matrix Grafts Impact Their Durability and Cell Attachment and Proliferation in anJournal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2024Article
- In Vitro and In Vivo Effects of IGF-1 Delivery Strategies on Tendon Healing: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Biological properties and surgical applications of the human amniotic membrane.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Growth Factor Roles in Soft Tissue Physiology and Pathophysiology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Evaluation of two distinct placental-derived membranes and their effect on tenocyte responses in vitro.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tendon healing is a complex, multiphase process that results in increased scar tissue formation, leading to weaker tendons. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the response of tenocytes to both hypothermically stored amniotic membrane (HSAM) and dehydrated amnion/chorion membrane (dACM). Composition and growth factor release from HSAM and dACM were evaluated using proteomics microarrays. HSAM and dACM releasate was used to assess tenocyte proliferation, migration, gene expression, extracellular matrix (ECM) protein deposition, and response to inflammation. Additionally, tenocyte-ECM interactions were evaluated. HSAM and dACM contain and release growth factors relevant to tendon healing, including insulin-like growth factor I, platelet-derived growth factor, and basic fibroblast growth factor. Both dACM and HSAM promoted increased tenocyte proliferation and migration; tenocytes treated with dACM proliferated more robustly, whereas treatment with HSAM resulted in higher migration. Both dACM and HSAM resulted in altered ECM gene expression; dACM grafts alone resulted in increases in collagen deposition. Furthermore, both allografts resulted in altered tenocyte responses to inflammation with reduced transforming growth factor beta levels. Additionally, dACM treatment resulted in increased expression and production of matrix metalloprotease-1 (MMP-1), whereas HSAM treatment resulted in decreased production of MMP-1. Tenocytes migrated into and remodeled HSAM only. These results indicate that both grafts have properties that support tendon healing; however, the results presented here suggest that the responses to each type of graft may be different. Due to the complex environment during tendon repair, additional work is needed to evaluate these effects using in vivo models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.