Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31062432›Full record

ArticleSkin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)2019

The role of viscosity on skin penetration from cellulose ether-based hydrogels.

Lisa Binder, Julia Mazál, Romana Petz, Victoria Klang, Claudia Valenta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Hydrogels and nanogels: effectiveness in dermal applications.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Investigating topical delivery of erythromycin laden into lipid nanocarrier for enhancing the anti-bacterial activity.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lisa BinderDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmaceutics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Julia MazálDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmaceutics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Romana PetzDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmaceutics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Victoria KlangDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmaceutics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2561-4378
Claudia ValentaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmaceutics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Research platform "Characterisation of Drug Delivery Systems on Skin and Investigation of Involved Mechanisms"
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rheological properties of dermal drug delivery systems are of importance when designing new formulations. Viscosity not only affects features such as spreadability and skin feel, but may also affect the skin penetration of incorporated actives. Data on the latter aspect are controversial. Our objective was to elucidate the relation between viscosity and drug delivery performance of different model hydrogels assuming that enhanced microviscosity might delay drug release and penetration. MATERIALS AND

methodsHydrogels covering a broad viscosity range were prepared by adding either HPMC or HEC as gelling agents in different concentrations. To investigate the ability of the gels to deliver a model drug into the skin, sulphadiazine sodium was incorporated and its in vitro skin penetration was monitored using tape stripping/HPLC analysis and non-invasive confocal Raman spectroscopy.

resultsThe trends observed with the two different experimental setups were comparable. Drug penetration depths decreased slightly with increasing viscosity, suggesting slower drug release due to the increasingly dense gel networks. However, the total penetrated drug amounts were independent of the exact formulation viscosity.

conclusionDrug penetration was largely unaffected by hydrogel viscosity. Moderately enhanced viscosity is advisable when designing cellulose ether hydrogels to allow for convenient application.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCelluloseEar, ExternalEtherHydrogelsHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationRheologySkinSkin AbsorptionSulfadiazineSus scrofaSwineViscosityAnti-Bacterial AgentsCelluloseEtherHydrogelsSulfadiazineconfocal raman spectroscopyrheological propertiesskin penetrationsulphadiazine sodiumtape strippingviscosity

Identifiers

PMID31062432
PMCPMC6850716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.