ArticleAmerican journal of primatology2019
Comparative genomics of Bifidobacterium species isolated from marmosets and humans.
Article in American journal of primatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bifidobacteria: biogeography, host adaptation and ecological functions.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026Review
- In vitro probiotic characteristics and whole-genome sequence analysis of lactic acid bacteria isolated from monkey faeces.3 Biotech · 2025Article
- Article
- Association of Primate Veterinarians Guidelines for the Management of Diarrhea.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2023Article
- The gut microbiome of exudivorous marmosets in the wild and captivity.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Oral and fecal microbiome of confiscated Bengal slow lorises in response to confinement duration.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Captive Common Marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) Are Colonized throughout Their Lives by a Community ofmBio · 2021Article
- The bifidobacterial distribution in the microbiome of captive primates reflects parvorder and feed specialization of the host.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Recent Development of ProbioticFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
- Clinical Management of Gastrointestinal Disease in the Common Marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).ILAR journal · 2020Review
- The Gastrointestinal Microbiota of the Common Marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).ILAR journal · 2020Review
- Comprehensive Mining and Characterization of CRISPR-Cas Systems inMicroorganisms · 2020Article
- Comparative genomics of Bifidobacterium species isolated from marmosets and humans.American journal of primatology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The genus Bifidobacterium is purported to have beneficial consequences for human health and is a major component of many gastrointestinal probiotics. Although species of Bifidobacterium are generally at low relative frequency in the adult human gastrointestinal tract, they can constitute high proportions of the gastrointestinal communities of adult marmosets. To identify genes that might be important for the maintenance of Bifidobacterium in adult marmosets, ten strains of Bifidobacterium were isolated from the feces of seven adult marmosets, and their genomes were sequenced. There were six B. reuteri strains, two B. callitrichos strains, one B. myosotis sp. nov. and one B. tissieri sp. nov. among our isolates. Phylogenetic analysis showed that three of the four species we isolated were most closely related to B. bifidum, B. breve and B. longum, which are species found in high abundance in human infants. There were 1357 genes that were shared by at least one strain of B. reuteri, B. callitrichos, B. breve, and B. longum, and 987 genes that were found in all strains of the four species. There were 106 genes found in B. reuteri and B. callitrichos but not in human bifidobacteria, and several of these genes were involved in nutrient uptake. These pathways for nutrient uptake appeared to be specific to Bifidobacterium from New World monkeys. Additionally, the distribution of Bifidobacterium in fecal samples from captive adult marmosets constituted as much as 80% of the gut microbiome, although this was variable between individuals and colonies. We suggest that nutrient transporters may be important for the maintenance of Bifidobacterium during adulthood in marmosets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.