Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31062388›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2019

Differences in norms towards the use of nicotine vaping products among adult smokers, former smokers and nicotine vaping product users: cross-sectional findings from the 2016 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey.

Sarah Aleyan, Katherine East, Ann McNeill, K Michael Cummings, Geoffrey T Fong, Hua-Hie Yong, James F Thrasher, Ron Borland, Sara C Hitchman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sex Differences in E-Cigarette Use and Related Health Effects.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Sarah AleyanSchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Katherine EastAddictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Ann McNeillAddictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
K Michael CummingsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Geoffrey T FongSchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Hua-Hie YongCancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
James F ThrasherDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Ron BorlandCancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Sara C HitchmanAddictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
King's College London · GBUK Centre for Tobacco & Alcohol Studies · GBCancer Council Victoria · AUMedical University of South Carolina · USUniversity of Melbourne · AUUniversity of South Carolina · USUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

Vaporized Nicotine Product Initiation Among Youth in the US, Canada, and England: Methods to Predict Uptake and Policy EfficacyP01CA200512 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI HAMMOND, DAVID · 2016 to 2025
$25.3M
CIHR FDN 148477National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia APP1106451NCI NIH HHS P01 CA200512UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol MR/K023195/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo examine whether norms towards nicotine vaping product (NVP) use varied between Australia, Canada, England and the United States and by socio-demographics, smoking and NVP status.

designCross-sectional data from the 2016 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey.

settingFour countries with distinct regulatory policies relating to the sale and advertising of NVPs: Australia (most restrictive), Canada (restrictive), England and the United States (least restrictive).

participantsA total of 10900 adult (age 18+) current smokers, former smokers, or at least weekly NVP users. Respondents were from Australia (n = 1366), Canada (n = 3309), England (n = 3835) and the United States (n = 2390). MEASUREMENTS: Questions permitted the categorization of respondents as current smokers, former smokers, NVP users and socio-demographic categories (sex, age, country, ethnicity, income and education). Further questions were asked regarding the frequency of exposure to NVPs in public, whether they had a partner or close friends who vaped and whether they believed society or those considered important to them approved of NVPs.

findingsAdjusting for relevant covariates, compared with Australian respondents, those in England, Canada and the United States were more likely to report frequent exposure to NVPs in public (83.1%, 57.3% and 48.3%, respectively, compared to 19.8% in Australia; P < 0.0001), having a partner who vaped (13.8%, 7.1% and 7.7%, respectively, compared to 2.1% in Australia; P < 0.0001) and having close friend(s) who vaped (31.7%, 25.3%, 20.9%, respectively, compared to 10.0% in Australia; P < 0.0001). Compared with Australian respondents, respondents from England were more likely to report that society (27.6% compared to 12.3% in Australia; P < 0.0001) and people important to them approved of NVP use (28.9% compared to 14.3% in Australia; P < 0.0001).

conclusionsNorms towards nicotine vaping product (NVP) use appear to vary among countries with different regulatory contexts regarding sales and advertising.

Indexed as

Social ValuesAdultAttitude to HealthAustraliaCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedSmokingSmoking CessationSocioeconomic FactorsUnited StatesAdultse-cigarettesnicotine vaping productssmokerssocial normssurvey

Identifiers

PMID31062388
PMCPMC7010266
OpenAlexW2944680180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.