Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31062381›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2019

Reward anticipation and punishment anticipation are instantiated in the brain via opponent mechanisms.

Jessica I Lake, Jeffrey M Spielberg, Zachary P Infantolino, Laura D Crocker, Cindy M Yee, Wendy Heller, Gregory A Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Believing and Beliefs-Neurophysiological Underpinnings.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jessica I LakeDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0003-0682-8725
Jeffrey M SpielbergDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.
Zachary P InfantolinoDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Laura D CrockerVA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California.
Cindy M YeeDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Wendy HellerDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois.
Gregory A MillerDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

Funding

Proj 5: Early Development (224-250)P50MH079485 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI O'REILLY, RANDALL CHARLES · 2008 to 2012
$8.7M
MECHANISMS OF ATTENTIONAL BIAS IN PSYCHOPATHOLOGYR01MH061358 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI HELLER, WENDY · 2000 to 2009
$2.6M
TRAINING IN COGNITIVE PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGYT32MH019554 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI HELLER, WENDY · 1992 to 2012
$2.3M
QUANTITATIVE METHODS FOR EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENTT32MH014257 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI REGENWETTER, MICHEL · 1985 to 2007
$1.9M
Cognitive and Affective Dysfunctions in the PsychosesT32MH096682 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI NUECHTERLEIN, KEITH H · 2013 to 2018
$1.1M
Neurocognitive Mechanisms: Appetitive &Aversive EmotionR21DA014111 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI MILLER, GREGORY ALLEN · 2001 to 2003
$549k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA014111NIH HHS P50 MH079485NIH HHS R01 MH61358NIH HHS R21 DA14111NIH HHS T32 MH096682NIH HHS T32 MH14257NIH HHS T32 MH19554NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH079485NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH061358NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH014257NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019554NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH096682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

fMRI investigations have examined the extent to which reward and punishment motivation are associated with common or opponent neural systems, but such investigations have been limited by confounding variables and methodological constraints. The present study aimed to address limitations of earlier approaches and more comprehensively evaluate the extent to which neural activation associated with reward and punishment motivation reflects opponent or shared systems. Participants completed a modified monetary incentive delay task, which involved the presentation of a cue followed by a target to which participants were required to make a speeded button press. Using a factorial design, cues indicated whether monetary reward and/or loss (i.e., cues signaled probability of reward, punishment, both, or neither) could be expected depending upon response speed. Neural analyses evaluated evidence of (a) directionally opposing effects by testing for regions of differential activation for reward and punishment anticipation, (b) mutual inhibition by testing for interactive effects of reward and punishment anticipation within a factorial design, and (c) opposing effects on shared outputs via a psychophysiological interaction analysis. Evidence supporting all three criteria for opponent systems was obtained. Collectively, present findings support conceptualizing reward and punishment motivation as opponent forces influencing brain and behavior and indicate that shared activation does not suggest the operation of a common neural mechanism instantiating reward and punishment motivation.

Indexed as

PunishmentRewardAdultAnticipation, PsychologicalBrainBrain MappingCuesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotivationReaction TimeYoung AdultdACCfMRIpunishmentrewardsaliencevalence

Identifiers

PMID31062381
PMCPMC7384772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.