Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31062287›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2019

Fundamental Studies of New Ionization Technologies and Insights from IMS-MS.

Sarah Trimpin, Ellen D Inutan, Santosh Karki, Efstathios A Elia, Wen-Jing Zhang, Steffen M Weidner, Darrell D Marshall, Khoa Hoang, Chuping Lee, Eric T J Davis and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sarah TrimpinDepartment of Chemistry, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA. Sarah.Trimpin@wayne.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3720-2269
Ellen D InutanDepartment of Chemistry, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Santosh KarkiDepartment of Chemistry, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Efstathios A EliaDepartment of Chemistry, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Wen-Jing ZhangDepartment of Chemistry, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Steffen M WeidnerBundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM), Berlin, Germany.
Darrell D MarshallDepartment of Chemistry, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Khoa HoangUniversity of the Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Chuping LeeDepartment of Chemistry, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Eric T J DavisDepartment of Chemistry, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Veronica SmithUniversity of the Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Anil K MeherDepartment of Chemistry, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Mario A CornejoDepartment of Chemistry, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Gregory W AunerDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Charles N McEwenMSTM, LLC, Newark, DE, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation CHE-1411376National Science Foundation Phase II 1556043 including TECP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exceptional ion mobility spectrometry mass spectrometry (IMS-MS) developments by von Helden, Jarrold, and Clemmer provided technology that gives a view of chemical/biological compositions previously not achievable. The ionization method of choice used with IMS-MS has been electrospray ionization (ESI). In this special issue contribution, we focus on fundamentals of heretofore unprecedented means for transferring volatile and nonvolatile compounds into gas-phase ions singly and multiply charged. These newer ionization processes frequently lead to different selectivity relative to ESI and, together with IMS-MS, may provide a more comprehensive view of chemical compositions directly from their original environment such as surfaces, e.g., tissue. Similarities of results using solvent- and matrix-assisted ionization are highlighted, as are differences between ESI and the inlet ionization methods, especially with mixtures such as bacterial extracts. Selectivity using different matrices is discussed, as are results which add to our fundamental knowledge of inlet ionization as well as pose additional avenues for inquiry. IMS-MS provides an opportunity for comparison studies relative to ESI and will prove valuable using the new ionization technologies for direct analyses. Our hypothesis is that some ESI-IMS-MS applications will be replaced by the new ionization processes and by understanding mechanistic aspects to aid enhanced source and method developments this will be hastened.

Indexed as

FundamentalsInlet ionizationInletsIon mobilityMatricesVacuum ionization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.