Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31062279›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2020

Perception of Breast Cancer Risk in Over 11,000 Patients During Routine Mammography Exam.

Baruch Abittan, Sarah Pachtman, Sarah Herman, Joseph Indelicato, Jonathan Herman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Baruch AbittanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, 270 - 05 76th Avenue, New Hyde Park, NY, 11040, USA. babittan2@northwell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3700-8690
Sarah PachtmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, 270 - 05 76th Avenue, New Hyde Park, NY, 11040, USA.
Sarah HermanUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Joseph IndelicatoDepartment of Psychology, The Touro College School of Health Sciences, Bay Shore, NY, USA.
Jonathan HermanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, 270 - 05 76th Avenue, New Hyde Park, NY, 11040, USA.
Long Island Jewish Medical Center · USNorthwell Health · USTouro College · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess women's knowledge of personal breast cancer risk. Additionally, we aimed to determine how often physicians are discussing individualized risk assessments of breast cancer with their patients, and if those discussion affected risk perception. Surveys were distributed in radiology centers in New York and made available to patients presenting for routine mammography. As exact number of patients who viewed the survey is unknown, response rate could not be assessed. Data from the survey was used to calculate each patient's personal breast cancer risk using the National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool. Each patient's actual breast cancer risk was compared to her perceived risk. 15,006 subjects submitted the survey and 11,365 were included in the final analysis. Fourteen percent of women were accurate in their 5-year estimation as compared to calculated risk, and only 7% of respondents were accurate in their estimation of risk by 90 years of age. There was no association between time since discussion of breast cancer risk and accuracy of estimating personal breast cancer risk (p = 0.17). There was no difference in risk estimation accuracy between women who had ever or had never discussed risk with her physician (p = 0.1064). Patients' perceived personal risk of developing breast cancer does not match the Gail model calculated risk. These findings hold true whether or not her physician had discussed personal breast cancer risk with her in the past. Further studies should determine effective strategies to educate patients about their breast cancer risk.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsBreast Self-ExaminationEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMammographyMiddle AgedNew YorkPerceptionPhysiciansRisk AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesBreast cancerBreast cancer riskCancer educationCancer screeningSelf-awareness

Identifiers

PMID31062279
OpenAlexW2942591175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.