Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31062278›Full record

SynthesisObesity surgery2019

Management of Staple Line Leaks Following Sleeve Gastrectomy-a Systematic Review.

Daniel Hughes, Ioan Hughes, Achal Khanna

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel HughesDepartment of General Surgery, Milton Keynes University Hospital, Standing Way, Eaglestone, Milton Keynes, MK6 5LD, UK. hughesdaniel32@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7167-1325
Ioan HughesQueen's University Belfast, University Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT7 1NN, UK.
Achal KhannaDepartment of General Surgery, Milton Keynes University Hospital, Standing Way, Eaglestone, Milton Keynes, MK6 5LD, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA staple line leak following a sleeve gastrectomy is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. No uniform guideline or consensus exists with regard to the optimal treatment approach to managing a staple line leak.

objectivesThe objective of this systematic review is to assess the efficacy and success rates of the different treatment strategies for staple line leak following sleeve gastrectomy.

methodsA thorough search through four online electronic databases was conducted using predefined search criteria. Our primary outcome measure was to review the treatment options described in the management of the staple line leak following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Successful initial management was defined as the proportion of cases that were successfully treated using the first modality described, with no escalation to another treatment option.

resultsA total of 26 articles were included in this systematic review. Successful initial management of 62% was achieved in patients who underwent endoscopic management, 76% in those who underwent surgery and 82% in patients treated conservatively. A total of 7 patient deaths were noted, all of which were patients who underwent surgery as the initial management of their staple line leak.

conclusionPrompt identification and adequate source control are crucial to successfully manage a staple line leak following sleeve gastrectomy. Treatment options are influenced by the clinical status of the patient. A stepwise treatment escalation approach is required to improve outcomes.

Indexed as

Anastomotic LeakGastrectomyHumansSurgical StaplingBariatric surgerySleeve gastrectomyStaple line leak

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.