Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31062216›Full record

ArticlePlant molecular biology2019

Novel transcriptional responses to heat revealed by turning up the heat at night.

Dmitry O Grinevich, Jigar S Desai, Kevin P Stroup, Jiaqi Duan, Erin Slabaugh, Colleen J Doherty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant molecular biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Investigating Circadian Gating of Temperature Responsive Genes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Clock-Controlled and Cold-InducedFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Warm nights disrupt transcriptome rhythms in field-grown rice panicles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dmitry O GrinevichDepartment of Molecular and Structural Biochemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2645-1929
Jigar S DesaiDepartment of Molecular and Structural Biochemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5238-3619
Kevin P StroupDepartment of Molecular and Structural Biochemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA.
Jiaqi DuanDepartment of Molecular and Structural Biochemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA.
Erin SlabaughDepartment of Molecular and Structural Biochemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA.
Colleen J DohertyDepartment of Molecular and Structural Biochemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA. colleen_doherty@ncsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1126-5592

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture (US) Hatch Project 1002035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageThe circadian clock controls many molecular activities, impacting experimental interpretation. We quantify the genome-wide effects of time-of-day on the heat-shock response and the effects of "diurnal bias" in stress experiments. Heat stress has significant adverse effects on plant productivity worldwide. Most experiments examining heat stress are performed during daytime hours, generating a 'diurnal bias' in the pathways and regulatory mechanisms identified. Such bias may confound downstream interpretations and limit our understanding of the full response to heat stress. Here we show that the transcriptional and physiological responses to a sudden heat shock in Arabidopsis are profoundly sensitive to the time of day. We observe that plant tolerance and acclimation to heat shock vary throughout the day and are maximal at dusk. Consistently, over 75% of heat-responsive transcripts show a time of day-dependent response, including many previously characterized heat-response genes. This temporal sensitivity implies a complex interaction between time and temperature where daily variations in basal transcription influence thermotolerance. When we examined these transcriptional responses, we uncovered novel night-response genes and cis-regulatory elements, underpinning new aspects of heat stress responses not previously appreciated. Exploiting this temporal variation can be applied to most environmental responses to understand the underlying network wiring. Therefore, we propose that using time as a perturbagen is an approach that will enhance our understanding of plant regulatory networks and responses to environmental stresses.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksAcclimatizationArabidopsisCircadian ClocksGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenome, PlantHeat-Shock ProteinsHeat-Shock ResponseHot TemperatureSeedlingsStress, PhysiologicalTranscription FactorsHeat-Shock ProteinsTranscription FactorsAbiotic stressCircadian clockDiel regulationGating of plant responsesHeat shockTranscriptional networks

Identifiers

PMID31062216
PMCPMC6695350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.