Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31062156›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020

Incisionless fluorescent cholangiography (IFC): a pilot survey of surgeons on procedural familiarity, practices, and perceptions.

Fernando Dip, Luis Sarotto, Mayank Roy, Aaron Lee, Emanuelle LoMenzo, Matthew Walsh, Thomas Carus, Sylke Schneider, Luigi Boni, Takeaki Ishizawa and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Fernando DipDepartment of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd, Weston, FL, 33331, USA.
Luis SarottoDepartment of Surgery, Hospital de Clinicas José de San Martin, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mayank RoyDepartment of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd, Weston, FL, 33331, USA.
Aaron LeeDepartment of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd, Weston, FL, 33331, USA.
Emanuelle LoMenzoDepartment of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd, Weston, FL, 33331, USA.
Matthew WalshDepartment of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Thomas CarusAskelopios Westklinikum, Hamburg, Germany.
Sylke SchneiderKlinikum Südstadt Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Luigi BoniUniversity of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Takeaki IshizawaUniversity of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Nohiro KokudoUniversity of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kevin WhiteScienceRight Consulting, London, ON, Canada.
Raul J RosenthalDepartment of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd, Weston, FL, 33331, USA. rosentr@ccf.org.ORCID 0000-0002-7663-2464

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncisionless fluorescent cholangiography (IFC) has recently been proven feasible, safe, and efficacious as an intraoperative procedure to help identify extrahepatic bile ducts during laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC). We conducted a pilot survey of 51 surgeons attending an international conference who perform endoscopic cholecystectomies to identify their typical LC practices, and perceptions of IFC.

methodsAn international panel of ten IFC experts, all with > 500 prior IFC procedures and related research publications, convened during the 4th International Congress of Fluorescence-Guided Surgery in Boca Raton, Florida in February 2017. The panel was charged with developing questions about LC practices and experience with IFC, and perceptions regarding its advantages, barriers to use, and indications. These questions then were asked to other congress attendees during one of the didactic sessions using an online polling application. Attendees, who ranged from zero to considerable experience performing IFC, accessed the survey via their portable devices.

resultsOf the 51 survey participants, 51% were from North America; 77% identified themselves as general/minimally invasive surgeons, and roughly 60% performed under 50 cholecystectomies/year. Only 12% performed routine intraoperative cholangiography (IOC), while 72.3% routinely performed critical safety reviews. Thirty-five percent estimated that their institution's laparoscopic-to-open surgery conversion rate was > 1% during LC. Roughly 95% of respondents felt that surgeons should have access to a noninvasive method for evaluating extrahepatic biliary structures; 84% felt that the most advantageous characteristic of IFC is the lack of any biliary-tree incision; and 93.3% felt that IFC would have considerable educational value in surgical training programs; and 78% felt that any surgeon who performs LC could benefit.

conclusionsSurgeons who participated in our survey overwhelmingly recommended the routine use of IFC during laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a complimentary imaging technique. Prospective randomized clinical trials remain necessary to determine whether IFC reduces the incidence of bile duct injuries and other LC complications.

Indexed as

PerceptionBile Duct DiseasesBile Ducts, ExtrahepaticCholangiographyCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCongresses as TopicFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesBile duct injuryFluorescence-guided surgeryIncisionless fluorescent cholangiographyIntraoperative radiologic cholangiographyLaparoscopic cholecystectomyNear-infrared fluorescence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.