ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2019
Can perforations of descemet's window (DW) improve the outcome of canaloplasty in open angle glaucoma?
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ten-Year Results After Canaloplasty and Phacocanaloplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Outcomes of Trabeculo-Descemet's Membrane Microperforation During Combined Phacoemulsification and Deep Sclerectomy.Journal of ophthalmic & vision research · 2025Article
- Historical and Contemporary Debates in Schlemm's Canal-Based MIGS.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Modified suture-assisted canaloplasty in Asians with primary open-angle glaucoma: a prospective study with 12-month follow-up.BMC ophthalmology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study evaluates whether additional opening of the descemet's window (DW) in canaloplasty has a positive effect on the intraocular pressure (IOP), glaucoma medication, visual acuity and postoperative complications and further interventions within the subsequent 12 months. This study also compares the difference of myopia and non-myopia based on the respective surgical method, as well as the quality of life after surgery by means of a questionnaire. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 114 patients who had a complete ophthalmic examination at baseline, as well as the first post-operative day and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months following the procedure. The patients were divided into three groups: group 1 with intact DW (n = 35), group 2 with accidental rupture of the DW (n = 40), and group 3 with scheduled puncture of the DW (n = 39). Main outcome parameters were IOP reduction and the number of IOP-lowering medications. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were documented systematically.
resultsWith a follow-up period of 12 months, all three groups showed statistically significant reductions in mean IOP and number of glaucoma medications as compared with preoperative values. At 12 months, group 1 (group 2/3) had a mean IOP reduction of 27.3% (33.1%/36.3%) and medication use reduction of 75% (82.6%/91.7%). Comparing the three surgical groups, there was no significant difference in terms of reduction of IOP and medication (p > 0.05) at all time points. Surgical complications were similarly rare. The number of subconjunctival blebs was statistically significantly different in the three groups (p < 0.05; group 1, 0%; group 2, 15%; group 3, 12.8%). Only in group 1, a revision after surgery was necessary in three cases. A significant difference concerning IOP, medication use, and visual acuity was not found between myopic eyes and non-myopic eyes after canaloplasty. The postop-surgical questionnaire showed that with 90.5% in group 1, 88.5% in group 2, and with 90.5% in group 3, the patients were highly satisfied with the results of surgery.
conclusionThe intraoperative scheduled puncture of the DW in tendency showed better but no statistically significant results after 1 year regarding lowering of the IOP, the visual acuity, and postoperative medication usage. In addition, no increased risk of complications was observed in the myopic eye after the opening of the DW.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.