Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31062146›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2019

Can perforations of descemet's window (DW) improve the outcome of canaloplasty in open angle glaucoma?

Barbara Pullig, Norbert Josef Koerber, Thomas Dietlein

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara PulligDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Germany. Barbarapullig@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3726-6892
Norbert Josef KoerberAugencentrum Köln-Porz, Josefstr. 14, 51143, Köln, Germany.
Thomas DietleinDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Germany.
University of Cologne · DECentrum für Integrierte Onkologie · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study evaluates whether additional opening of the descemet's window (DW) in canaloplasty has a positive effect on the intraocular pressure (IOP), glaucoma medication, visual acuity and postoperative complications and further interventions within the subsequent 12 months. This study also compares the difference of myopia and non-myopia based on the respective surgical method, as well as the quality of life after surgery by means of a questionnaire. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis retrospective study included 114 patients who had a complete ophthalmic examination at baseline, as well as the first post-operative day and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months following the procedure. The patients were divided into three groups: group 1 with intact DW (n = 35), group 2 with accidental rupture of the DW (n = 40), and group 3 with scheduled puncture of the DW (n = 39). Main outcome parameters were IOP reduction and the number of IOP-lowering medications. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were documented systematically.

resultsWith a follow-up period of 12 months, all three groups showed statistically significant reductions in mean IOP and number of glaucoma medications as compared with preoperative values. At 12 months, group 1 (group 2/3) had a mean IOP reduction of 27.3% (33.1%/36.3%) and medication use reduction of 75% (82.6%/91.7%). Comparing the three surgical groups, there was no significant difference in terms of reduction of IOP and medication (p > 0.05) at all time points. Surgical complications were similarly rare. The number of subconjunctival blebs was statistically significantly different in the three groups (p < 0.05; group 1, 0%; group 2, 15%; group 3, 12.8%). Only in group 1, a revision after surgery was necessary in three cases. A significant difference concerning IOP, medication use, and visual acuity was not found between myopic eyes and non-myopic eyes after canaloplasty. The postop-surgical questionnaire showed that with 90.5% in group 1, 88.5% in group 2, and with 90.5% in group 3, the patients were highly satisfied with the results of surgery.

conclusionThe intraoperative scheduled puncture of the DW in tendency showed better but no statistically significant results after 1 year regarding lowering of the IOP, the visual acuity, and postoperative medication usage. In addition, no increased risk of complications was observed in the myopic eye after the opening of the DW.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityAgedDescemet MembraneFemaleFiltering SurgeryFollow-Up StudiesGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIntraocular PressureMalePlastic Surgery ProceduresRetrospective StudiesScleraTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeCanaloplastyGlaucoma surgeryNon-perforating surgeryQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID31062146
OpenAlexW2944087238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.