Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31062131›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2020

Influence of different PEEP levels on electrical impedance tomography findings in patients under general anesthesia ventilated in the lateral decubitus position.

Andrej Šribar, Vlasta Merc, Zoran Peršec, Jasminka Peršec, Ivan Milas, Sanja Husedžinović

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Impact of Manual Sustained Inflation vs Stepwise PEEP on Pulmonary and Cerebral Outcomes in Carotid Endarterectomy Patients.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrej ŠribarClinical Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Dubrava, Av. Gojka Šuška 6, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia. andrej.sribar@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6517-9895
Vlasta MercClinical Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Dubrava, Av. Gojka Šuška 6, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
Zoran PeršecDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia.
Jasminka PeršecClinical Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Dubrava, Av. Gojka Šuška 6, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3777-8153
Ivan MilasClinical Department of Urology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Sanja HusedžinovićZagreb Dental Polyclinic, Zagreb, Croatia.
University Hospital Dubrava · HRUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb · HRUniversity of Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine the effect of various PEEP levels on electrical impedance tomography (EIT) measured differences in regional ventilation, hemodynamics, lung mechanics and parameters of alveolar gas exchange. Thirty three patients scheduled for elective urologic surgery in general anesthesia in lateral decubitus position were randomized into three groups-PEEP 0, 5 and 10 mbar. EIT recording, arterial blood gas analysis and hemodynamic parameters were captured at three timepoints-before induction (T0), 5 min after lateral positioning (T1) and 90 min after positioning (T2). Dynamic compliance (Cdyn) was measured at T1 and T2. Offline EIT data analysis was performed to calculate EIT derived parameters of ventilation distribution. Patients ventilated with PEEP of 10 mbar had a significantly lower A-a (alveolo arterial) gradient over measurements and symmetrical distribution of ventilation measured by EIT. There was no significant difference in Cdyn, center of ventilation indices and inhomogeneity index between groups. There was no difference of mean arterial pressure, cardiac index and heart rate between groups. Patients with 5 mbar of PEEP had higher stroke volume index compared to 0 and 10 mbar at baseline and over measurements. Nondependent/dependent TV ratio as well as global inhomogeneity index were correlated with A-a gradient. Dynamic compliance showed no correlation to A-a gradient. In our study, a PEEP level of 10 mbar improved alveolar gas exchange without compromising hemodynamic stability in patients mechanically ventilated in the lateral decubitus position. EIT measured parameters may be used to determine optimal ventilation parameters in these patients with inhomogeneous lung mechanics. Further studies are needed in patients with various lung pathologies.

Indexed as

Electric ImpedancePositive-Pressure RespirationAdultAgedAnesthesia, GeneralFemaleHemodynamic MonitoringHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, IntraoperativePatient PositioningProspective StudiesPulmonary Gas ExchangeRespiratory MechanicsSingle-Blind MethodElectrical impedance tomographyLateral positionMechanical ventilationPEEPUrology

Identifiers

PMID31062131
PMCPMC7223527
OpenAlexW2943917689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.