ArticleJournal of digital imaging2020
Computer-Aided Detection of Incidental Lumbar Spine Fractures from Routine Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Studies Using a Support Vector Machine (SVM) Classifier.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for opportunistic screening of osteoporosis across multiple imaging modalities: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Predictive value of machine learning on fracture risk in osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2023Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy and potential covariates of artificial intelligence for diagnosing orthopedic fractures: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2022Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Fracture Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Radiology · 2022Pooled it
- Optimizing neurosurgical operating room schedule: Integrating machine learning models for operative time prediction and schedule design.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal imaging: realistic clinical applications in the next decade.Skeletal radiology · 2024Review
- Can we screen opportunistically for low bone mineral density using CT scans of the shoulder and artificial intelligence?The British journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Review
- Applied Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Review of Computer Vision Technology Application in Hospital Settings.Journal of imaging · 2024Review
- Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Spinal Injury: A Narrative Review of Algorithms in Diagnosis and Prognosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence in fracture detection with different image modalities and data types: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Detection of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures on Lateral Chest Radiographs in Post-Menopausal Women.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Detecting whether L1 or other lumbar levels would be excluded from DXA bone mineral density analysis during opportunistic CT screening for osteoporosis using machine learning.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023Article
- Machine Learning Applications in Spine Surgery.Cureus · 2023Review
- Revolutionizing Spinal Care: Current Applications and Future Directions of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Performance of a deep convolutional neural network for MRI-based vertebral body measurements and insufficiency fracture detection.European radiology · 2023Article
- Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis and osteopenia from CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis using machine learning.European radiology · 2023Article
- Current Applications of Machine Learning in Spine: From Clinical View.Global spine journal · 2022Review
- Support vector machines are superior to principal components analysis for selecting the optimal bones' CT attenuations for opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using CT scans of the foot or ankle.Osteoporosis and sarcopenia · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence and spine imaging: limitations, regulatory issues and future direction.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess whether application of a support vector machine learning algorithm to ancillary data obtained from posterior-anterior dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) studies could identify patients with lumbar spine (L1-L4) vertebral body fractures without additional DEXA imaging or radiation. Three hundred seven patients (199 without any fractures of the spine, and 108 patients with at least one fracture of the L1, L2, L3, or L4 vertebral bodies) who had DEXA studies were evaluated. Ancillary data from DEXA output was analyzed. The dataset was split into training (80%) and test (20%) datasets. Support vector machines (SVMs) with 10-fold cross-validation and different kernels were used to identify the best kernel based on the greatest area under the curve (AUC) and the best training vectors in the training dataset. The SVM with the best kernel was then applied to the test dataset to assess the accuracy of the SVM. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the SVMs using different kernels in the test dataset were compared using DeLong's test. The SVM classifier with the linear kernel had the greatest AUC in the training dataset (AUC = 0.9258). The AUC of the SVM classifier with the linear kernel in the test dataset was 0.8963. The SVM classifier with the linear kernel had an overall average accuracy of 91.8% in the test dataset. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive of the SVM classifier with the linear kernel to detect lumbar spine fractures were 81.8%, 97.4%, 94.7%, and 90.5%, respectively. The SVM classifier with the linear kernel ROC curve had a significantly better AUC than the SVM classifier with the cubic polynomial kernel (P = 0.034) for discriminating between patients with lumbar spine fractures and control patients, but not significantly different from the SVM classifier with a radial basis function (RBF) kernel (P = 0.317) or the SVM classifier with a sigmoid kernel (P = 0.729). All fractures identified by the SVM classifiers were not prospectively identified by the radiologist. SVM analysis of ancillary data obtained from routine DEXA studies can identify lumbar spine fractures without the use of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) DEXA imaging or radiation, and identify fractures missed by radiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.