Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31062056›Full record

ReviewSkeletal radiology2019

Pearls and pitfalls of fluoroscopic-guided foot and ankle injections: what the radiologist needs to know.

Barry G Hansford, Megan K Mills, Christopher J Hanrahan, Corrie M Yablon

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Skeletal radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Barry G HansfordOregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. hansford@ohsu.edu.
Megan K MillsDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, 30 N 1900 E, Rm #1A71, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
Christopher J HanrahanDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, 30 N 1900 E, Rm #1A71, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
Corrie M YablonUniversity of Michigan Health System, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr, TC2910Q, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis article provides a comprehensive, joint-by-joint review of fluoroscopic-guided foot and ankle injections and emphasizes pre-procedural planning, relevant anatomy, appropriate technique, troubleshooting the difficult procedure, and the importance of communicating unexpected findings with the referring clinician. The interrogation of pain generators including variant ossicles, fractures, and post-surgical/traumatic findings is also described.

conclusionsEven the most challenging foot and ankle injections may be successfully completed with a solid anatomical understanding and thoughtful approach.

Indexed as

Adrenal Cortex HormonesAnkle JointFluoroscopyFoot DiseasesFoot JointsHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularPainRadiography, InterventionalAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnkleAnkle jointFootInjectionsPain

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.