Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31061714›Full record

ReviewMaternal health, neonatology and perinatology2019

Evidence-based design for neonatal units: a systematic review.

N O'Callaghan, A Dee, R K Philip

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Equitable therapeutic design: how inclusively designed spaces help NICU families heal, connect, and thrive.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. The Healing Hermeneutics of Carnal Caring in Neonatal Intensive Care Units.Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. A unit's experience with hybrid NICU design: description of care model and implications for patients, families, and professionals.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Article
  17. NICU Couplet Care: metrics to guide an evolving model of care.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

N O'CallaghanMid-West Department of Public Health, HSE, Limerick, Ireland.
A DeeMid-West Department of Public Health, HSE, Limerick, Ireland.
R K Philip2Graduate Entry Medical School (GEMS), University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-6097-9869

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence-based design (EBD) of hospitals could significantly improve patient safety and make patient, staff and family environments healthier. This systematic review aims to determine which neonatal intensive care unit design features lead to improved neonatal, parental and staff outcomes. Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science Citation Index and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Registry, were searched in January 2017. Using combinations of the relevant key words, review was performed following the recommended guidelines for reporting systematic reviews. English language limitation was applied and term limited to 2006-2016. Included studies were assigned a grade based upon their level of evidence and critically appraised using defined tools. Data were not synthesized for meta-analysis due to nature of literature reviewed and heterogeneity. Three thousand five hundred ninety-two titles were screened with 43 full-texts assessed for eligibility. Twenty nine studies were deemed eligible for inclusion. These included 19 cohort studies, two qualitative studies, seven cross-sectional studies, and one randomised control trial. Grey literature search from guidelines, and repositories yielded an additional 10 guidelines.

Indexed as

Evidence-based designFamily centred careHospital designNeonatal intensive care unitOpen bay unitSingle family room

Identifiers

PMID31061714
PMCPMC6492317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.