Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31061661›Full record

ArticleJournal of oncology2019

Direct Genetics Referral Pathway for High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Patients: The "Opt-Out" Process.

Jacob McGee, Teresa M Peart, Norine Foley, Monique Bertrand, Michel Prefontaine, Akira Sugimoto, Helen Ettler, Stephen Welch, Karen Panabaker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Potential Impact of the Medicare Prescription Payment Plan for Medicare Part D Beneficiaries With a Cancer Diagnosis.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jacob McGeeDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3210-0682
Teresa M PeartDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada.
Norine FoleyDepartment of Aging, Rehabilitation & Geriatric Care Program, Division of Stroke Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Canada.
Monique BertrandDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada.
Michel PrefontaineDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada.
Akira SugimotoDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada.
Helen EttlerDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada.
Stephen WelchDepartment of Medical Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada.
Karen PanabakerDepartment of Medical Genetics, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn order to meet a clinical need for better pathways to access genetic testing for ovarian cancer patients, we implemented and reviewed an opt-out referral process for genetic consultation whereby a referral is automatically sent to genetics following a pathological diagnosis of HGSC.

methodsFollowing implementation of the opt-out referral process, each month a list of new cases of HGSC was generated from the synoptic pathology report and forwarded directly to the Cancer Genetics clinic. Using an advanced directive, patients were automatically referred for genetic counselling two months after surgery. If the patient declined genetic counselling (opted-out) after discussion with their surgeon within the two months after surgery, the Genetic Counsellor was informed and the patient was removed from the referral process.

resultsBetween January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017, 168 women were diagnosed with HGSC, of whom 167 received a referral for genetic consultation. In only one case the referral was cancelled by the surgeon, resulting in a referral rate of 99.4%. By the end of the study period, 133 women attended a genetics consultation appointment and 125 (94%) agreed to proceed with genetic testing. Among those who completed genetic testing, 15% tested positive for a

conclusionsThe opt-out referral process described in this study is s a feasible, effective, and patient-centred approach to increase access to

Identifiers

PMID31061661
PMCPMC6466895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.