ReviewContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2019
Therapy with CD4
Review in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regulatory T cells in autoimmune diseases: biological mechanisms, clinical translation, and translational challenges.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- CpG ODN Combined with Gold Nanorods Enhances Immune Activation and Its Potential Mechanism.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Human Regulatory T Cells: Understanding the Role of Tregs in Select Autoimmune Skin Diseases and Post-Transplant Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Development of an extended half-life GM-CSF fusion protein for Parkinson's disease.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2022Article
- Harnessing Antitumor CD4Cancers · 2022Review
- Conditioned medium from human cord blood mesenchymal stem cells attenuates age-related immune dysfunctions.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- Gold nanorods-mediated efficient synergistic immunotherapy for detection and inhibition of postoperative tumor recurrence.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2021Article
- Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor mRNA and Neuroprotective Immunity in Parkinson's disease.Biomaterials · 2021Article
- CXCR4 and CXCR7 Signaling Pathways: A Focus on the Cross-Talk Between Cancer Cells and Tumor Microenvironment.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review focuses on the role of regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the process of carcinogenesis. The controversy of this issue arose due to the increasing therapeutic use of Tregs in humans (inter alia, in the treatment of autoimmune diseases). It is mainly due to potential dangers related to immunosuppressive activity of these cells, especially regarding cancer. The natural function of regulatory T cells (which is the suppression of excessive activity of the immune system) is purportedly linked to an increased risk of cancer initiation. This work brings together and summarizes the most important reports of researchers dealing with this problem and attempts to explain doubts and fears related to Tregs and their uncertain connection with cancer initiation and progression. It is clearly shown that regulatory T cells are associated with acceleration of existing tumors (they are attracted by microenvironments created by cancer cells) but cannot initiate them on their own.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.