Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31061538›Full record

ArticleNature medicine2019

Methionine is a metabolic dependency of tumor-initiating cells.

Zhenxun Wang, Lian Yee Yip, Jia Hui Jane Lee, Zhengwei Wu, Hui Yi Chew, Pooi Kiat William Chong, Chin Chye Teo, Heather Yin-Kuan Ang, Kai Lay Esther Peh, Ju Yuan and 14 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 245 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
245citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

245 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 386 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Lung cancer metabolism: a dynamic and adaptive network.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

185 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Zhenxun WangGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Lian Yee YipBioprocessing Technology Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Jia Hui Jane LeeGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Zhengwei WuGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Hui Yi ChewGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Pooi Kiat William ChongBioprocessing Technology Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Chin Chye TeoBioprocessing Technology Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Heather Yin-Kuan AngGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Kai Lay Esther PehBioprocessing Technology Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Ju YuanGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Siming MaGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Li Shi Kimberly ChooGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Nurhidayah BasriBioprocessing Technology Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Xia JiangGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Qiang YuGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Axel M HillmerGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3381-7266
Wan Teck LimDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Tony Kiat Hon LimDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Angela TakanoDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Eng Huat TanDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Daniel Shao Weng TanGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Ying Swan HoBioprocessing Technology Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Bing LimMerck Sharp and Dohme Translational Medicine Research Centre, Singapore, Singapore. bing.lim@merck.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9534-6781
Wai Leong TamGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore. tamwl@gis.a-star.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2365-5264
Agency for Science, Technology and Research · SGSingapore General Hospital · SGMerck (Singapore) · SGNational Cancer Centre Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding cellular metabolism holds immense potential for developing new classes of therapeutics that target metabolic pathways in cancer. Metabolic pathways are altered in bulk neoplastic cells in comparison to normal tissues. However, carcinoma cells within tumors are heterogeneous, and tumor-initiating cells (TICs) are important therapeutic targets that have remained metabolically uncharacterized. To understand their metabolic alterations, we performed metabolomics and metabolite tracing analyses, which revealed that TICs have highly elevated methionine cycle activity and transmethylation rates that are driven by MAT2A. High methionine cycle activity causes methionine consumption to far outstrip its regeneration, leading to addiction to exogenous methionine. Pharmacological inhibition of the methionine cycle, even transiently, is sufficient to cripple the tumor-initiating capability of these cells. Methionine cycle flux specifically influences the epigenetic state of cancer cells and drives tumor initiation. Methionine cycle enzymes are also enriched in other tumor types, and MAT2A expression impinges upon the sensitivity of certain cancer cells to therapeutic inhibition.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorFemaleGene Knockdown TechniquesGlycine Dehydrogenase (Decarboxylating)HumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMetabolomicsMethionineMethionine AdenosyltransferaseMiceNeoplastic Stem CellsGlycine Dehydrogenase (Decarboxylating)MAT2A protein, humanMethionineMethionine AdenosyltransferaseS-Adenosylmethionine

Identifiers

PMID31061538
OpenAlexW2943637393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.