Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31061473›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

A highly flexible and repeatable genotyping method for aquaculture studies based on target amplicon sequencing using next-generation sequencing technology.

Mana Sato, Sho Hosoya, Sota Yoshikawa, Shun Ohki, Yuki Kobayashi, Takuya Itou, Kiyoshi Kikuchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Deep learning for genomic selection of aquatic animals.Marine life science & technology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Population Genetic Analyses ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mana SatoFisheries Laboratory, University of Tokyo, Hamamatsu, 431-0214, Japan.
Sho HosoyaFisheries Laboratory, University of Tokyo, Hamamatsu, 431-0214, Japan. ahosoya@mail.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6652-9925
Sota YoshikawaFisheries Laboratory, University of Tokyo, Hamamatsu, 431-0214, Japan.
Shun OhkiFisheries Laboratory, University of Tokyo, Hamamatsu, 431-0214, Japan.
Yuki KobayashiVeterinary Research Center, Nihon University, Kanagawa, 252-0880, Japan.
Takuya ItouVeterinary Research Center, Nihon University, Kanagawa, 252-0880, Japan.
Kiyoshi KikuchiFisheries Laboratory, University of Tokyo, Hamamatsu, 431-0214, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies using genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have become commonplace in genetics and genomics, due to advances in high-throughput sequencing technologies. Since the numbers of required SNPs and samples vary depending on each research goal, genotyping technologies with high flexibility in the number of SNPs/samples and high repeatability have been intensively investigated. For example, the ultrahigh-multiplexed amplicon sequencing, Ion AmpliSeq, has been used as a high-throughput genotyping method mainly for diagnostic purposes. Here, we designed a custom panel targeting 3,187 genome-wide SNPs of fugu, Takifugu rubripes, and applied it for genotyping farmed fugu to test its feasibility in aquaculture studies. We sequenced two libraries consisting of different pools of individuals (n = 326 each) on the Illumina MiSeq sequencer. Consequently, over 99% target regions (3,178 SNPs) were amplified and 2,655 SNPs were available after filtering steps. Strong correlation was observed in the mean depth of coverage of each SNP between duplicate runs (r = 0.993). Genetic analysis using these genotype data successfully detected the known population structure and the sex determining locus of fugu. These results show the method is superior in repeatability and flexibility, and suits genetic studies including molecular breeding, such as marker assisted and genomic selection.

Indexed as

AquacultureHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAnimalsGenotyping TechniquesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideTakifugu

Identifiers

PMID31061473
PMCPMC6502806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.