ArticleScientific reports2019
The Effect of Freezing on Non-invasive Prenatal Testing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic cytogenetic testing following positive noninvasive prenatal screening results of sex chromosome abnormalities: Report of five cases and systematic review of evidence.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Technical improvement on next-generation sequencing in clinical application.Practical laboratory medicine · 2025Article
- Analysis of fetal fraction in non-invasive prenatal testing with low-depth whole genome sequencing.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Factors Affecting the Fetal Fraction in Noninvasive Prenatal Screening: A Review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- Analysis of the clinical features of pericentric inversion of chromosome 9.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Article
- Non-invasive prenatal test to screen common trisomies in twin pregnancies.Molecular cytogenetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plasma cryopreservation is unavoidable in China, due to technical specifications requiring storage of additional plasma at -80 degrees for three years. However, the effect of freezing on non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is still uncertain. We collected 144 euploid pregnant samples, 22 on trisomy 21, 4 on trisomy 13, and 3 on trisomy 18, by massively parallel sequencing before and after freezing. Compared with the success rate of 100% of fresh samples, the detection success rates of trisomy 21, trisomy 13 and euploidy in frozen samples by NIPT were 95.45%, 75% and 95.14%, respectively. Of these, 9 cases of frozen sample sequencing failed, with 8 cases being due to high GC content. The chromosome 21 (chr21) z-value of the frozen trisomy 21 samples was lower than that of fresh samples. Meanwhile, freezing reduced the male positive foetal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fraction, which was accompanied by an increase in the Unimap-GC level in the massively parallel sequencing data and a decrease in the Unique reads/Total reads ratio. Laboratory freezing reduced the chr21 z-value of foetal trisomy 21, which can be explained by a reduction in the foetal cfDNA fraction and effective Unique reads for NIPT analysis. The Unimap-GC content of the serum samples after freezing was higher, which can lead to failure of NIPT detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.