Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31061409›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Inferring the direction of rhythmic neural transmission via inter-regional phase-amplitude coupling (ir-PAC).

Bijurika Nandi, Peter Swiatek, Bernat Kocsis, Mingzhou Ding

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. CB-1 receptor agonist drastically changes oscillatory activity, defining active sleep.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Differential neural mechanisms underlie cortical gating of visual spatial attention mediated by alpha-band oscillations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bijurika NandiJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Peter SwiatekDepartment of Psychiatry at BIDMC, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Bernat KocsisDepartment of Psychiatry at BIDMC, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. bkocsis@hms.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4371-3249
Mingzhou DingJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. mding@bme.ufl.edu.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Spatiotemporal Network Dynamics in a Rat Model of SchizophreniaR01MH100820 · NIMH · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI DING, MINGZHOU, KOCSIS, BERNAT · 2014 to 2018
$2.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100820U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) R01MH100820
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) estimates the statistical dependence between the phase of a low-frequency component and the amplitude of a high-frequency component of local field potentials (LFP). To date PAC has been mainly applied to one signal. In this work, we introduce a new application of PAC to two LFPs and suggest that it can be used to infer the direction and strength of rhythmic neural transmission between distinct brain networks. This hypothesis is based on the accumulating evidence that transmembrane currents related to action potentials contribute a broad-band component to LFP in the high-gamma band, and PAC calculated between the amplitude of high-gamma (>60 Hz) in one LFP and the phase of a low-frequency oscillation (e.g., theta) in another would therefore relate the output (spiking) of one area to the input (somatic/dendritic postsynaptic potentials) of the other. We tested the hypothesis on theta-band long range communications between hippocampus and prefrontal cortex (PFC) and theta-band short range communications between dentate gyrus (DG) and the Ammon's horn (CA1) within the hippocampus. The ground truth was provided by the known anatomical connections predicting hippocampus → PFC and DG → CA1, i.e., theta transmission is unidirectional in both cases: from hippocampus to PFC and from DG to CA1 along the tri-synaptic pathway within hippocampus. We found that (1) hippocampal high-gamma amplitude was significantly coupled to PFC theta phase, but not vice versa; (2) similarly, DG high-gamma amplitude was significantly coupled to CA1 theta phase, but not vice versa, and (3) the DG high-gamma-CA1 theta PAC was significantly correlated with DG → CA1 Granger causality, a well-established analytical measure of directional neural transmission. These results support the hypothesis that inter-regional PAC (ir-PAC) can be used to relate the output of a rhythmic "driver" network (i.e., high gamma) to the input of a rhythmic "receiver" network (i.e., theta) and thereby establish the direction and strength of rhythmic neural transmission.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsSynaptic TransmissionBrainCA1 Region, HippocampalCognitionHippocampusNerve NetTheta Rhythm

Identifiers

PMID31061409
PMCPMC6502832
OpenAlexW2949358035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.