ArticleScientific reports2019
Neuro-musculoskeletal flexible multibody simulation yields a framework for efficient bone failure risk assessment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neural control meets biomechanics in the motor assessment of neurological disorders: a narrative review.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2025Review
- [Numerical simulation in musculoskeletal biomechanics : Application perspectives and possibilities].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Kinematics and kinetics comparison of ultra-congruent versus medial-pivot designs for total knee arthroplasty by multibody analysis.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Finite element analysis of bone remodelling with piezoelectric effects using an open-source framework.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2021Article
- Femoral neck strain prediction during level walking using a combined musculoskeletal and finite element model approach.PloS one · 2021Article
- Musculoskeletal Multibody Simulation Analysis on the Impact of Patellar Component Design and Positioning on Joint Dynamics after Unconstrained Total Knee Arthroplasty.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Effect of surgical parameters on the biomechanical behaviour of bicondylar total knee endoprostheses - A robot-assisted test method based on a musculoskeletal model.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fragility fractures are a major socioeconomic problem. A non-invasive, computationally-efficient method for the identification of fracture risk scenarios under the representation of neuro-musculoskeletal dynamics does not exist. We introduce a computational workflow that integrates modally-reduced, quantitative CT-based finite-element models into neuro-musculoskeletal flexible multibody simulation (NfMBS) for early bone fracture risk assessment. Our workflow quantifies the bone strength via the osteogenic stresses and strains that arise due to the physiological-like loading of the bone under the representation of patient-specific neuro-musculoskeletal dynamics. This allows for non-invasive, computationally-efficient dynamic analysis over the enormous parameter space of fracture risk scenarios, while requiring only sparse clinical data. Experimental validation on a fresh human femur specimen together with femur strength computations that were consistent with literature findings provide confidence in the workflow: The simulation of an entire squat took only 38 s CPU-time. Owing to the loss (16% cortical, 33% trabecular) of bone mineral density (BMD), the strain measure that is associated with bone fracture increased by 31.4%; and yielded an elevated risk of a femoral hip fracture. Our novel workflow could offer clinicians with decision-making guidance by enabling the first combined in-silico analysis tool using NfMBS and BMD measurements for optimized bone fracture risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.