Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31061123›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Dated language phylogenies shed light on the ancestry of Sino-Tibetan.

Laurent Sagart, Guillaume Jacques, Yunfan Lai, Robin J Ryder, Valentin Thouzeau, Simon J Greenhill, Johann-Mattis List

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genetic structure and admixture of the Yi and Qiang in southwestern China.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2026
    Article
  6. Evaluating the phylogenetic signal of morphosyntax.Poznan studies in contemporary linguistics : PSiCL · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Sourcing the origins of carnelian in early Chinese civilizations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laurent SagartCentre de Recherches Linguistiques sur l'Asie Orientale, CNRS, Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, 75006 Paris, France.
Guillaume JacquesCentre de Recherches Linguistiques sur l'Asie Orientale, CNRS, Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, 75006 Paris, France.
Yunfan LaiDepartment of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena 07743, Germany.
Robin J RyderCentre de Recherches en Mathématiques de la Décision, CNRS, Université Paris-Dauphine, PSL University, 75775 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7467-0467
Valentin ThouzeauCentre de Recherches en Mathématiques de la Décision, CNRS, Université Paris-Dauphine, PSL University, 75775 Paris, France.
Simon J GreenhillDepartment of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena 07743, Germany.
Johann-Mattis ListDepartment of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena 07743, Germany; list@shh.mpg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Sino-Tibetan language family is one of the world's largest and most prominent families, spoken by nearly 1.4 billion people. Despite the importance of the Sino-Tibetan languages, their prehistory remains controversial, with ongoing debate about when and where they originated. To shed light on this debate we develop a database of comparative linguistic data, and apply the linguistic comparative method to identify sound correspondences and establish cognates. We then use phylogenetic methods to infer the relationships among these languages and estimate the age of their origin and homeland. Our findings point to Sino-Tibetan originating with north Chinese millet farmers around 7200 B.P. and suggest a link to the late Cishan and the early Yangshao cultures.

Indexed as

LanguageChinaHumansLinguisticsPhylogenyTibetcomputer-assisted language comparisonEast Asiahuman prehistorypeoplingSino-Tibetan languages

Identifiers

PMID31061123
PMCPMC6534992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.