Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31061115›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Living with plague: Lessons from the Soviet Union's antiplague system.

Susan D Jones, Bakyt Atshabar, Boris V Schmid, Marlene Zuk, Anna Amramina, Nils Chr Stenseth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exploring and Mitigating Plague for One Health Purposes.Current tropical medicine reports · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The first step in the success or failure of emerging pathogens.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Past pandemics and climate variability across the Mediterranean.Euro-Mediterranean journal for environmental integration · 2020
    Article
  20. The next chapter of human-plague science.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Susan D JonesDepartment of Ecology, Evolution & Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108; jone0996@umn.edu n.c.stenseth@mn.uio.no.
Bakyt AtshabarM. Aikimbayev's Kazakh Scientific Centre for Quarantine and Zoonotic Diseases, Ministry of Public Health, Almaty 480074, Republic of Kazakhstan.
Boris V SchmidCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, N-01316 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0452-623X
Marlene ZukDepartment of Ecology, Evolution & Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.
Anna AmraminaProgram in History of Science & Technology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.
Nils Chr StensethCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, N-01316 Oslo, Norway; jone0996@umn.edu n.c.stenseth@mn.uio.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zoonoses, such as plague, are primarily animal diseases that spill over into human populations. While the goal of eradicating such diseases is enticing, historical experience validates abandoning eradication in favor of ecologically based control strategies (which reduce morbidity and mortality to a locally accepted risk level). During the 20th century, one of the most extensive plague-eradication efforts in recorded history was undertaken to enable large-scale changes in land use in the former Soviet Union (including vast areas of central Asia). Despite expending tremendous resources in its attempt to eradicate plague, the Soviet antiplague response gradually abandoned the goal of eradication in favor of plague control linked with developing basic knowledge of plague ecology. Drawing from this experience, we combine new gray-literature sources, historical and recent research, and fieldwork to outline best practices for the control of spillover from zoonoses while minimally disrupting wildlife ecosystems, and we briefly compare the Soviet case with that of endemic plague in the western United States. We argue for the allocation of sufficient resources to maintain ongoing local surveillance, education, and targeted control measures; to incorporate novel technologies selectively; and to use ecological research to inform developing landscape-based models for transmission interruption. We conclude that living with emergent and reemergent zoonotic diseases-switching to control-opens wider possibilities for interrupting spillover while preserving natural ecosystems, encouraging adaptation to local conditions, and using technological tools judiciously and in a cost-effective way.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease OutbreaksEcosystemHumansPlagueRodentiaSiphonapteraUSSRYersinia pestisZoonosesdisease control programsdisease ecologyeradication programsUSSR historyYersinia pestis

Identifiers

PMID31061115
PMCPMC6511024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.