Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31061057›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Efficacy of a personalised pelvic floor muscle training programme on urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy (MaTchUP): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Paul Hodges, Ryan Stafford, Geoff D Coughlin, Jessica Kasza, James Ashton-Miller, Anne P Cameron, Luke Connelly, Leanne M Hall

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04628351 (The Effect of Structured Bladder Training Program on Lower Urinary System Symptoms and Quality of Life After Radical Prostatectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04628351 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Structured Bladder Training Program on Lower Urinary System Symptoms and Quality of Life After Radical Prostatectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorSaglik Bilimleri UniversitesiRan2019 to 2020Enrolled60ConditionsUrinary Incontinence, Quality of Life, Lower Urinary Tract SymptomsArmsBladder Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paul HodgesSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Ryan StaffordSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Geoff D CoughlinRenal Medicine, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Jessica KaszaEpidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
James Ashton-MillerDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Anne P CameronDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Luke ConnellyCentre for the Business and Economics of Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Leanne M HallSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

Research Education CoreP30AG024824 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Neil Alexander · 2004 to 2026
$29.2M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024824
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProstate cancer is the most common cancer in men. Prostatectomy is the most common treatment. Morbidity from prostatectomy is high-80% of men experience urinary incontinence which negatively impacts the quality of life. Postsurgical pelvic floor muscle training is commonly prescribed but recent systematic reviews found no evidence of efficacy. We propose a new treatment that commences preoperatively and targets functional training of specific pelvic floor muscles that contribute to urinary continence. Assessment and biofeedback using transperineal ultrasound imaging assists in training. This will be compared against conventional training (maximal pelvic floor muscle contraction assessed by digital rectal examination) and no training. Embedded physiological studies will allow the investigation of moderation and mediation of the treatment effect on the outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This randomised clinical trial will include 363 men scheduled to undergo radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Participants will be randomised into urethral training, conventional training and no training groups. Clinical data will be collected at baseline (1-2 weeks presurgery) and postsurgery after catheter removal, weekly to 3 months (primary endpoint) and monthly to 12 months. Outcomes include 24-hour pad weight test (primary), incontinence, quality of life and cost-effectiveness data. Neuromuscular control measures of pelvic floor muscles will be measured at baseline, postsurgery, 6 weeks, 3 and 12 months. Study assessors and statisticians will be blinded to the group allocation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry and has ethical approval from the university and host hospital ethics committees. Trial outcomes will be shared via national/international conference presentations and peer-reviewed journal publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12617000788370; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyPelvic FloorProstatectomyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsProstatic NeoplasmsSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeUrinary Incontinenceclinical trialsprostate diseaserehabilitation medicineultrasoundurinary incontinences

Identifiers

PMID31061057
PMCPMC6502040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.