Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31061043›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2019

Intramedullary nails versus distal locking plates for fracture of the distal femur: results from the Trial of Acute Femoral Fracture Fixation (TrAFFix) randomised feasibility study and process evaluation.

Xavier L Griffin, Matthew L Costa, Emma Phelps, Nicholas Parsons, Melina Dritsaki, Juul Achten, Elizabeth Tutton, Robin Gillmore Lerner, Alwin McGibbon, Janis Baird and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for treating fractures of the distal femur in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The geriatric distal femur fracture: nail, plate or both?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xavier L GriffinOxford Trauma, University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford, UK.
Matthew L CostaOxford Trauma, University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford, UK.
Emma PhelpsOxford Trauma, University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford, UK.
Nicholas ParsonsStatistics and Epidemiology Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Melina DritsakiOxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford, UK.
Juul AchtenOxford Trauma, University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford, UK.
Elizabeth TuttonOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Robin Gillmore LernerKadoorie Centre, University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8372-8181
Alwin McGibbonPatient and Public Representative, Coventry, UK.
Janis BairdMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
TraFFix study collaborators
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBUniversity of Warwick · GBCoventry (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health HTA/15/59/22Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1017Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis feasibility study and process evaluation assessed the likely success of a definitive trial of intramedullary fixation with locked retrograde nails versus extramedullary fixation with fixed angle plates for fractures of the distal femur. DESIGN &

settingA multicentre, parallel, two-arm, randomised controlled feasibility study with an embedded process evaluation was conducted at seven NHS hospitals in England. Treatment was randomly allocated in 1:1 ratio, stratified by centre and chronic cognitive impairment. Participants, but not surgeons or research staff, were blinded to the allocation.

participantsPatients 18 years and older with a fracture of the distal femur, who their surgeon believed would benefit from internal fixation, were eligible to take part.Participants were allocated to receive either a retrograde intramedullary nail or an anatomical locking plate. OUTCOMES: The primary outcomes for this feasibility study were the recruitment rate and completion rate of the EQ-5D-5L at 4 months post-randomisation. Baseline characteristics, disability rating index, quality of life scores, measurements of social support and self-efficacy, resource use and radiographic assessments were also collected. The views of patients and staff were collected during interviews.

resultsRecruitment and data completion were lower than expected. 23 of 82 eligible patients were recruited (nail, 11; plate, 12). The recruitment rate was estimated as 0.42 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.62) participants per centre-month. Data completeness of the EQ-5D-5L at 4 months was 61 per cent (95% CI 43% to 83%). The process evaluation demonstrated that the main barriers to recruitment were variation in treatment pathways across centres, lack of surgeon equipoise and confidence in using both interventions and newly formed research cultures that lacked cohesion.

conclusionsA modified trial design, with embedded recruitment support intervention, comparing functional outcome in cognitively intact adults who have sustained a fragility fracture of the distal femur is feasible. ETHICS APPROVAL: The Wales Research Ethics Committee 5 approved the study (ref: 16/WA/0225). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN92089567; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Bone NailsBone PlatesAgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesFemaleFemoral FracturesFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryHumansMaleMiddle AgedProcess Assessment, Health CareSingle-Blind Methodclinical trialsfeasibility studiesfemoral fracturesfracture fixation, internalfractures, bonerandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID31061043
PMCPMC6502051
OpenAlexW2944720993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.