Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31061034›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Protocol for a scoping review of multi-omic analysis for rare diseases.

Katie Kerr, Helen McAneney, Amy Jayne McKnight

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katie KerrCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8469-8885
Helen McAneneyCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5248-7872
Amy Jayne McKnightCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7482-709X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe development of next generation sequencing technology has enabled cost-efficient, large scale, multiple 'omic' analysis, including epigenomic, genomic, metabolomic, phenomic, proteomic and transcriptomic research. These integrated approaches hold significant promise for rare disease research, with the potential to aid biomarker discovery, improve our understanding of disease pathogenesis and identify novel therapeutic targets. In this paper we outline a systematic approach for a scoping review designed to evaluate what primary research has been performed to date on multi-omics and rare disease. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol was designed using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. Databases to be searched will include: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar for primary studies relevant to the key terms 'multi-omics' and 'rare disease', published prior to 30 ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As a secondary analysis study with no primary data generated, this scoping review does not require ethical approval. We anticipate this review will highlight a gap in rare disease research and provide direction for novel research. The completed review will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences discussing rare disease research and/or molecular strategies.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBiomedical ResearchDNA Mutational AnalysisEpigenomicsGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsHumansMetabolomicsPhenomicsProteomicsRare DiseasesResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicBiomarkersbiomarkerepigenomicsmulti-omicsrare diseasetranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID31061034
PMCPMC6501961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.