Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31061013›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Targeted, structured text messaging to improve dietary and lifestyle behaviours for people on maintenance haemodialysis (KIDNEYTEXT): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Jessica Stevenson, Katrina L Campbell, Mark Brown, Jonathan Craig, Kirsten Howard, Martin Howell, Rabia Khalid, Kamal Sud, Armando Teixeira-Pinto, Aravinda Thiagalingam and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Patient-centred clinical trial design.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Jessica StevensonThe Centre for Kidney Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9925-745X
Katrina L CampbellFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Mark BrownRenal Medicine, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.
Jonathan CraigSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Kirsten HowardSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Martin HowellSchool of Public Health, University of Sydney - Camperdown and Darlington Campus, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Rabia KhalidWestmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Kamal SudCentre for Transplant and Renal Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Armando Teixeira-PintoScreening and Test Evaluation Program (STEP), School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Aravinda ThiagalingamSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Allison TongSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Clara ChowWestmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Vincent W LeeRenal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUBond University · AUKidney Research UK · GBNepean Hospital · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionManaging nutrition is critical for reducing morbidity and mortality in patients on haemodialysis but adherence to the complex dietary restrictions remains problematic. Innovative interventions to enhance the delivery of nutritional care are needed. The aim of this phase II trial is to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a targeted mobile phone text messaging system to improve dietary and lifestyle behaviours in patients on long-term haemodialysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Single-blinded randomised controlled trial with 6 months of follow-up in 130 patients on haemodialysis who will be randomised to either standard care or KIDNEYTEXT. The KIDNEYTEXT intervention group will receive three text messages per week for 6 months. The text messages provide customised dietary information and advice based on renal dietary guidelines and general healthy eating dietary guidelines, and motivation and support to improve behaviours. The primary outcome is feasibility including recruitment rate, drop-out rate, adherence to renal dietary recommendations, participant satisfaction and a process evaluation using semistructured interviews with a subset of purposively sampled participants. Secondary and exploratory outcomes include a range of clinical and behavioural outcomes and a healthcare utilisation cost analysis will be undertaken. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Western Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee-Westmead. Results will be presented at scientific meetings and published in peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12617001084370; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Renal DialysisAdultCell PhoneFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient SatisfactionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk Reduction BehaviorText Messagingdialysisdietary interventionnutritiontelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID31061013
PMCPMC6502028
OpenAlexW2944045153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.