Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31061010›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2019

Validity and effectiveness of paediatric early warning systems and track and trigger tools for identifying and reducing clinical deterioration in hospitalised children: a systematic review.

Rob Trubey, Chao Huang, Fiona V Lugg-Widger, Kerenza Hood, Davina Allen, Dawn Edwards, David Lacy, Amy Lloyd, Mala Mann, Brendan Mason and 7 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Modified Delphi study about implementation of early warning scores].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. [Early warning scores: a rapid umbrella review].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Machine Learning-Based Pediatric Early Warning Score: Patient Outcomes in a Pre- Versus Post-Implementation Study, 2019-2023.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Rob TrubeyCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9550-1785
Chao HuangHull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Fiona V Lugg-WidgerCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0029-9703
Kerenza HoodCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Davina AllenSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Dawn EdwardsDepartment of Paediatrics, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK.
David LacyWirral University Teaching Hospital, Wirral, UK.
Amy LloydCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Mala MannUniversity Library Services, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Brendan MasonPublic Health Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Alison OliverDepartment of Paediatric Intensive Care, Noah's Ark Children's Hospital for Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Damian RolandSAPPHIRE Group, Health Sciences, Leicester University, Leicester, UK.
Gerri SeftonAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Richard SkoneDepartment of Paediatric Intensive Care, Noah's Ark Children's Hospital for Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Emma Thomas-JonesCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Lyvonne N TumeFaculty of Health and Applied Sciences (HAS), University of the West of England Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Colin PowellDepartment of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Sidra Medical and Research Center, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

Department of Health HS&DR/12/178/17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess (1) how well validated existing paediatric track and trigger tools (PTTT) are for predicting adverse outcomes in hospitalised children, and (2) how effective broader paediatric early warning systems are at reducing adverse outcomes in hospitalised children.

designSystematic review. DATA SOURCES: British Nursing Index, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, EMBASE, Health Management Information Centre, Medline, Medline in Process, Scopus and Web of Knowledge searched through May 2018. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included (1) papers reporting on the development or validation of a PTTT or (2) the implementation of a broader early warning system in paediatric units (age 0-18 years), where adverse outcome metrics were reported. Several study designs were considered. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data extraction was conducted by two independent reviewers using template forms. Studies were quality assessed using a modified Downs and Black rating scale.

results36 validation studies and 30 effectiveness studies were included, with 27 unique PTTT identified. Validation studies were largely retrospective case-control studies or chart reviews, while effectiveness studies were predominantly uncontrolled before-after studies. Metrics of adverse outcomes varied considerably. Some PTTT demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy in retrospective case-control studies (primarily for predicting paediatric intensive care unit transfers), but positive predictive value was consistently low, suggesting potential for alarm fatigue. A small number of effectiveness studies reported significant decreases in mortality, arrests or code calls, but were limited by methodological concerns. Overall, there was limited evidence of paediatric early warning system interventions leading to reductions in deterioration.

conclusionThere are several fundamental methodological limitations in the PTTT literature, and the predominance of single-site studies carried out in specialist centres greatly limits generalisability. With limited evidence of effectiveness, calls to make PTTT mandatory across all paediatric units are not supported by the evidence base. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015015326.

Indexed as

Child, HospitalizedClinical AlarmsClinical DeteriorationEarly Warning ScoreMonitoring, PhysiologicChildHumansIntensive Care Units, PediatricReproducibility of Resultschildrenclinical deteriorationearly warning scoresPEWSsystematic reviewtrack and trigger scores

Identifiers

PMID31061010
PMCPMC6502038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.