Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31060973›Full record

ArticleClinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))2019

International Variation in Criteria for Internal Mammary Chain Radiotherapy.

F K Duane, P McGale, S Teoh, C Mortimer, J Broggio, S C Darby, D Dodwell, B Lavery, S Oliveros, K A Vallis and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Internal mammary lymphadenopathy in breast cancer: a narrative review and update.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

F K DuaneSt Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: fduane@tcd.ie.
P McGaleClinical Trial Service Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
S TeohCRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
C MortimerCRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
J BroggioPublic Health England, Birmingham, UK.
S C DarbyClinical Trial Service Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
D DodwellClinical Trial Service Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
B LaveryOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
S OliverosOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
K A VallisCRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
C W TaylorClinical Trial Service Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation RE/13/1/30181Cancer Research UK 21133Cancer Research UK C8225/A21133Department of HealthMedical Research Council MC_U137686858
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsEvidence has emerged that internal mammary chain (IMC) radiotherapy reduces breast cancer mortality, leading to changes in treatment guidelines. This study investigated current IMC radiotherapy criteria and the percentages of patients irradiated for breast cancer in England who fulfilled them. MATERIALS AND

methodsA systematic search was undertaken for national guidelines published in English during 2013-2018 presenting criteria for 'consideration of' or 'recommendation for' IMC radiotherapy. Patient and tumour variables were collected for patients who received breast cancer radiotherapy in England during 2012-2016. The percentages of patients fulfilling criteria stipulated in each set of guidelines were calculated.

resultsIn total, 111 729 women were recorded as receiving adjuvant breast cancer radiotherapy in England during 2012-2016 and full data were available on 48 095 of them. Percentages of patients fulfilling IMC radiotherapy criteria in various national guidelines were: UK Royal College of Radiologists 13% (6035/48 095), UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 18% (8816/48 095), Germany 32% (15 646/48 095), Ireland 56% (26 846/48 095) and USA 59% (28 373/48 095). Differences between countries occurred because in Ireland and the USA, treatment may be considered in some node-negative patients, whereas in the UK, treatment is considered if at least four axillary nodes are involved or for high-risk patients with one to three positive nodes. In Germany, treatment may be considered for all node-positive patients.

conclusionsThere is substantial variability between countries in criteria for consideration of IMC radiotherapy, despite guidelines being based on the same evidence. This will probably lead to large variations in practice and resource needs worldwide.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreastBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymph NodesMiddle AgedRadiotherapy, AdjuvantInternal mammary chaininternational criteriaradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID31060973
PMCPMC6575151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.