ArticleBiophysical journal2019
Venus
Article in Biophysical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-Equilibrium Dynamics of the Time-Dependent Excitonic Coupling in Fluorescent Protein Dimers.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026Article
- Dynamic structures of dengue virus serotype 2 secreted NS1 and their interactions with heparan sulfate.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Quantum Biology Using Ultrafast Integrative and Molecular Engineering Tools: A Perspective.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Anomalous photophysical behaviors attributed to excitonic coupling in fluorescent proteins.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- Fluorescence Anisotropy for Detailed Analysis of Doxorubicin Loading into DNA Origami Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery.ACS applied nano materials · 2025Article
- Real-time single-molecule imaging of CaMKII-calmodulin interactions.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- Ultrafast fluorescence depolarisation in green fluorescence protein tandem dimers as hydrophobic environment sensitive probes.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2023Article
- Article
- Binary-FRET reveals transient excited-state structure associated with activity-dependent CaMKII - NR2B binding and adaptation.Nature communications · 2022Article
- A Guide to Fluorescence Lifetime Microscopy and Förster's Resonance Energy Transfer in Neuroscience.Current protocols in neuroscience · 2020Review
- FRET as a biomolecular research tool - understanding its potential while avoiding pitfalls.Nature methods · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Fluorescent proteins (FPs) have revolutionized cell biology by allowing genetic tagging of specific proteins inside living cells. In conjunction with Förster's resonance energy transfer (FRET) measurements, FP-tagged proteins can be used to study protein-protein interactions and estimate distances between tagged proteins. FRET is mediated by weak Coulombic dipole-dipole coupling of donor and acceptor fluorophores that behave independently, with energy hopping discretely and incoherently between fluorophores. Stronger dipole-dipole coupling can mediate excitonic coupling in which excitation energy is distributed near instantaneously between coherently interacting excited states that behave as a single quantum entity. The interpretation of FP energy transfer measurements to estimate separation often assumes that donors and acceptors are very weakly coupled and therefore use a FRET mechanism. This assumption is considered reasonable as close fluorophore proximity, typically associated with strong excitonic coupling, is limited by the FP β-barrel structure. Furthermore, physiological temperatures promote rapid vibrational dephasing associated with a rapid decoherence of fluorophore-excited states. Recently, FP dephasing times that are 50 times slower than traditional organic fluorophores have been measured, raising the possibility that evolution has shaped FPs to allow stronger than expected coupling under physiological conditions. In this study, we test if excitonic coupling between FPs is possible at physiological temperatures. FRET and excitonic coupling can be distinguished by monitoring spectral changes associated with fluorophore dimerization. The weak coupling mediating FRET should not cause a change in fluorophore absorption, whereas strong excitonic coupling causes Davydov splitting. Circular dichroism spectroscopy revealed Davydov splitting when the yellow FP Venus
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.