Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31060812›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2019

Venus

Youngchan Kim, Henry L Puhl, Eefei Chen, Grace H Taumoefolau, Tuan A Nguyen, David S Kliger, Paul S Blank, Steven S Vogel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Youngchan KimSection on Cellular Biophotonics, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Henry L PuhlSection on Cellular Biophotonics, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Eefei ChenChemistry and Biochemistry Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California.
Grace H TaumoefolauSection on Cellular Biophotonics, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Tuan A NguyenSection on Cellular Biophotonics, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
David S KligerChemistry and Biochemistry Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California.
Paul S BlankSection on Integrative Biophysics, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Steven S VogelSection on Cellular Biophotonics, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. Electronic address: stevevog@mail.nih.gov.
National Institutes of Health · USUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · US

Funding

FRET imaging of protein-protein interactions inside living cellsZIAAA000452 · NIAAA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM · PI VOGEL, STEVEN S · 2009 to 2025
$27.0M
Circular Dichroism SpectropolarimeterS10OD016246 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI KLIGER, DAVID S. · 2014 to 2014
$132k
NIH HHS S10 OD016246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescent proteins (FPs) have revolutionized cell biology by allowing genetic tagging of specific proteins inside living cells. In conjunction with Förster's resonance energy transfer (FRET) measurements, FP-tagged proteins can be used to study protein-protein interactions and estimate distances between tagged proteins. FRET is mediated by weak Coulombic dipole-dipole coupling of donor and acceptor fluorophores that behave independently, with energy hopping discretely and incoherently between fluorophores. Stronger dipole-dipole coupling can mediate excitonic coupling in which excitation energy is distributed near instantaneously between coherently interacting excited states that behave as a single quantum entity. The interpretation of FP energy transfer measurements to estimate separation often assumes that donors and acceptors are very weakly coupled and therefore use a FRET mechanism. This assumption is considered reasonable as close fluorophore proximity, typically associated with strong excitonic coupling, is limited by the FP β-barrel structure. Furthermore, physiological temperatures promote rapid vibrational dephasing associated with a rapid decoherence of fluorophore-excited states. Recently, FP dephasing times that are 50 times slower than traditional organic fluorophores have been measured, raising the possibility that evolution has shaped FPs to allow stronger than expected coupling under physiological conditions. In this study, we test if excitonic coupling between FPs is possible at physiological temperatures. FRET and excitonic coupling can be distinguished by monitoring spectral changes associated with fluorophore dimerization. The weak coupling mediating FRET should not cause a change in fluorophore absorption, whereas strong excitonic coupling causes Davydov splitting. Circular dichroism spectroscopy revealed Davydov splitting when the yellow FP Venus

Indexed as

Protein MultimerizationTemperatureHEK293 CellsHumansLuminescent ProteinsModels, MolecularProtein Structure, QuaternaryLuminescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31060812
PMCPMC6531926
OpenAlexW2942306324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.