Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31060546›Full record

ArticleBMC biotechnology2019

Frequency of off-targeting in genome edited pigs produced via direct injection of the CRISPR/Cas9 system into developing embryos.

Kayla Carey, Junghyun Ryu, Kyungjun Uh, Andrea J Lengi, Sherrie Clark-Deener, Benjamin A Corl, Kiho Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The making of cells and organs in xenogeneic animal bioreactor.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Use of Genome Editing Techniques to Produce Transgenic Farm Animals.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Review
  10. Current status of the application of gene editing in pigs.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Effects of Dense Granular Protein 6 (GRA6) Disruption onFrontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kayla CareyDepartment of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
Junghyun RyuDepartment of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
Kyungjun UhDepartment of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
Andrea J LengiDepartment of Dairy Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
Sherrie Clark-DeenerLarge Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
Benjamin A CorlDepartment of Dairy Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
Kiho LeeDepartment of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA. kiholee@vt.edu.
Virginia Tech · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe CRISPR/Cas9 system can effectively introduce site-specific modifications to the genome. The efficiency is high enough to induce targeted genome modifications during embryogenesis, thus increasing the efficiency of producing genetically modified animal models and having potential clinical applications as an assisted reproductive technology. Because most of the CRISPR/Cas9 systems introduce site-specific double-stranded breaks (DSBs) to induce site-specific modifications, a major concern is its potential off-targeting activity, which may hinder the application of the technology in clinics. In this study, we investigated off-targeting events in genome edited pigs/fetuses that were generated through direct injection of the CRISPR/Cas9 system into developing embryos; off-targeting activity of four different sgRNAs targeting RAG2, IL2RG, SCD5, and Ig Heavy chain were examined.

resultsFirst, bioinformatics analysis was applied to identify 27 potential off-targeting genes from the sgRNAs. Then, PCR amplification followed by sequencing analysis was used to verify the presence of off-targeting events. Off-targeting events were only identified from the sgRNA used to disrupt Ig Heavy chain in pigs; frequency of off-targeting was 80 and 70% on AR and RBFOX1 locus respectively. A potential PAM sequence was present in both of the off-targeting genes adjacent to probable sgRNA binding sites. Mismatches against sgRNA were present only on the 5' side of AR, suggesting that off-targeting activities are systematic events. However, the mismatches on RBFOX1 were not limited to the 5' side, indicating unpredictability of the events.

conclusionsThe prevalence of off-targeting is low via direct injection of CRISPR/Cas9 system into developing embryos, but the events cannot be accurately predicted. Off-targeting frequency of each CRISPR/Cas9 system should be deliberately assessed prior to its application in clinics.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsAnimalsBase SequenceEmbryo, MammalianGene EditingGene TargetingMutationSequence Analysis, DNASwineCRISPR/Cas9Embryo developmentGenome-editingOff-targeting

Identifiers

PMID31060546
PMCPMC6501304
OpenAlexW2947745111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.