Trial reportBMC pediatrics2019
Evaluation of two SpO
Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Automated oxygen delivery for preterm infants with respiratory dysfunction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Routine use of automated FiOFrontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the impact of oximeter averaging times on automated FiOFrontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Frequency and duration of extreme hypoxemic and hyperoxemic episodes during manual and automatic oxygen control in preterm infants: a retrospective cohort analysis from randomized studies.BMC pediatrics · 2022Article
- Update on ventilatory management of extremely preterm infants-A Neonatal Intensive Care Unit perspective.Paediatric anaesthesia · 2022Review
- State of Science in Alarm System Safety: Implications for Researchers, Vendors, and Clinical Leaders.Biomedical instrumentation & technology · 2022Article
- Automated Oxygen Delivery in Neonatal Intensive Care.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- The relationship between intermittent hypoxemia events and neural outcomes in neonates.Experimental neurology · 2021Review
- Thresholds for oximetry alarms and target range in the NICU: an observational assessment based on likely oxygen tension and maturity.BMC pediatrics · 2020Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChanges in oxygen saturation (SpO
methodsAn unblinded randomized crossover study was conducted in a single NICU among infants routinely managed with Auto-FiO
resultsDuring a 13-month period 26 neonates were randomized. The analysis included 21 subjects with 49 days of both tight and loose intervention. The loose alarm strategy resulted in a reduction in the median rate of SpO
conclusionsIn this group of infants we found a marked advantage of the looser alarm strategy. We conclude that the paradigms of alarm strategies used for manual titration of oxygen need to be reconsidered when using Auto-FiO
trial registrationRetrospectively registered 15 May 2018 at ISRCTN ( 49239883 ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.