ArticleAnnals of internal medicine2019
Hypertension.
Article in Annals of internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- An updated network meta-analysis of non-pharmacological interventions for primary hypertension in adults: insights from recent studies.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- 2019 AHA/ACC Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With High Blood Pressure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2019Guideline
- 2019 AHA/ACC Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With High Blood Pressure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2019Guideline
- Physical Activity Recommendations Tailored by a Predictive Model for Adults With High Blood Pressure: Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Observational
- The exquisite link between potassium homeostasis regulation and cardiovascular health: exploration and analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Association between inflammation indicators and albuminuria in US adults: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Non-pharmacological interventions for primary hypertension: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Traditional Chinese Medicine Injections Combined With Antihypertensive Drugs for Hypertensive Nephropathy: A Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byHypertension.2019
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent guidelines on diagnosis and management of high blood pressure (BP) include substantial changes and several new concepts compared with previous guidelines. These are reviewed and their clinical implications are discussed in this article. The goal is to provide a practical reference to assist clinicians with up-to-date management of patients with high BP. Important issues include new diagnostic thresholds, out-of-office BP monitoring, intensified treatment goals, and a different approach to resistant hypertension. Finally, differences among guidelines, the persistent controversies that have led to them, and their implications for clinical practice are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31060074What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.