ArticleJournal of theoretical biology2019
Oscillations in well-mixed, deterministic feedback systems: Beyond ring oscillators.
Article in Journal of theoretical biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-stability in cellular differentiation enabled by a network of three mutually repressing master regulators.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A ring oscillator is a system in which one species regulates the next, which regulates the next and so on until the last species regulates the first. In addition, the number of the regulations which are negative, and so result in a reduction in the regulated species, is odd, making the overall feedback in the loop negative. In ring oscillators, the probability of oscillations is maximised if the degradation rates of the species are equal. When there is more than one loop in the regulatory network, the dynamics can be more complicated. Here, a systematic way of organising the characteristic equation of ODE models of regulatory networks is provided. This facilitates the identification of Hopf bifurcations. It is shown that the probability of oscillations in non-ring systems is maximised for unequal degradation rates. For example, when there is a ring and a second ring employing a subset of the genes in the first ring, then the probability of oscillations is maximised when the species in the sub-ring degrade more slowly than those outside, for a negative feedback subring. When the sub-ring forms a positive feedback loop, the optimal degradation rates are larger for the species in the sub-ring, provided the positive feedback is not too strong. By contrast, optimal degradation rates are smaller for the species in the sub-ring, when the positive feedback is very strong. Adding a positive feedback loop to a repressilator increases the probability of oscillations, provided the positive feedback is not too strong, whereas adding a negative feedback loop decreases the probability of oscillations. The work is illustrated with numerical simulations of example systems: an autoregulatory gene model in which transcription is downregulated by the protein dimer and three-species and four-species gene regulatory network examples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.