Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31059715›Full record

ArticleJournal of theoretical biology2019

Oscillations in well-mixed, deterministic feedback systems: Beyond ring oscillators.

Karen M Page

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of theoretical biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Karen M PageDepartment of Mathematics, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, U.K.. Electronic address: karen.page@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A ring oscillator is a system in which one species regulates the next, which regulates the next and so on until the last species regulates the first. In addition, the number of the regulations which are negative, and so result in a reduction in the regulated species, is odd, making the overall feedback in the loop negative. In ring oscillators, the probability of oscillations is maximised if the degradation rates of the species are equal. When there is more than one loop in the regulatory network, the dynamics can be more complicated. Here, a systematic way of organising the characteristic equation of ODE models of regulatory networks is provided. This facilitates the identification of Hopf bifurcations. It is shown that the probability of oscillations in non-ring systems is maximised for unequal degradation rates. For example, when there is a ring and a second ring employing a subset of the genes in the first ring, then the probability of oscillations is maximised when the species in the sub-ring degrade more slowly than those outside, for a negative feedback subring. When the sub-ring forms a positive feedback loop, the optimal degradation rates are larger for the species in the sub-ring, provided the positive feedback is not too strong. By contrast, optimal degradation rates are smaller for the species in the sub-ring, when the positive feedback is very strong. Adding a positive feedback loop to a repressilator increases the probability of oscillations, provided the positive feedback is not too strong, whereas adding a negative feedback loop decreases the probability of oscillations. The work is illustrated with numerical simulations of example systems: an autoregulatory gene model in which transcription is downregulated by the protein dimer and three-species and four-species gene regulatory network examples.

Indexed as

Biological ClocksComputer SimulationGene Regulatory NetworksModels, GeneticGene regulatory networkHopf bifurcationNetwork motifOscillationsRing oscillator

Identifiers

PMID31059715
PMCPMC6859483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.